TITLE    : Procreative Fiction
STORYID  : procreative-fiction
SUMMARY  : Why writers write what they write.
AUTHOR   : Cal Y. Pygia@lit
DATE     : 2010-05-20
CATEGORY : reviews-and-essays
FLAGS    : 
TAGS     : |procreation|homosexuals|lesbians|gays|transsexuals|shemales|writers|readers|


I like penises. More specifically, I like circumcised penises. And I like balls, big or small. I prefer scrotums that, when they rise, high and tight, are smooth, although they may be wrinkled when relaxed. I like asses, too, especially feminine asses. Men's asses, to be attractive to me, must be sleek, compact, and firm. I like medium- to small-size tits and dislike large, floppy mammary glands with big, protruding nipples. I don't care for cunts, except, perhaps, the hairless, dimple type. I prefer Caucasians to Asians, and Asians to African-Americans or Latinos, and I favor blondes over brunettes and brunettes over redheads.



That's all well and good, you may be thinking, but why the hell should I give a rat's ass what you like?



Fair enough (although a bit harsh, perhaps).



Stay with me a bit longer, and I think you'll see how my own idiosyncratic preferences may suggest some ideas worth considering in regard to erotic fiction in general and the effects that I hope will result from mine in particular.



Writers (and readers) have personal agendas. They write about sex, whether anal, oral, vaginal, or otherwise, between men and women, between men and other men, between women and other women, between men and transwomen (or transmen), between women and transmen (or transwomen), and between transmen and transwomen, transmen and transmen, or transwomen and transwomen, or some combination thereof.



The type of sex about which they write, like the type of characters about whom they write as indulging in such sex, implies the orientations or preferences--or the interests, at the very least--of the writers who write about them and of the readers who read about them. Implicit in erotic stories of all kinds are the writer's (and the reader's) attitudes, beliefs, biases, dreams, fears, hopes, preferences, prejudices, thoughts, and values. In the first paragraph of my essay, I identify many of my own peculiar interests, openly and explicitly.



But, even if I hadn't done so, if you read any of my essays, novels, poems, or short stories, you would discern for yourself, readily enough, these same interests, along with what might be regarded as an obsession with such forms of sex and sexuality as anal intercourse, BDSM and spanking, cunnilingus, exhibitionism, fellatio, gay sex, incest between siblings, lesbianism, masturbation, sadomasochism, and voyeurism. You would see, also, that my stories are populated, as it were, with catamites and sodomites, BDSM devotees, spanking enthusiasts, exhibitionists and voyeurs, fans of oral sex, gays, lesbians, brothers and sisters, and male-to-female transsexuals who have opted to retain their male genitals.



Predominant among the catalogue of sexual perversions about which I write is anal intercourse, and my most frequently depicted characters are shemales (that is, as I use the term, male-to-female transsexuals who have opted to retain their male genitals). It was in realizing this fact that I conceived this essay.



I prefer to write about the same type of sex (anal intercourse) and the same sort of characters (shemales) as I enjoy most reading about or viewing in X-rated films. Why? The answer seems obvious: I love hard, thick, circumcised cocks, balls, asses, and breasts, but am revolted by pussies. A shemale being fucked in the ass by a stud has everything I enjoy, while omitting the one thing I find repulsive: the cunt. In fact, cocks and balls, and asses are multiplied.



I have the illusion of heterosexuality, but I am enjoying the "reality" of homosexuality, filtered, as it were, through the "lens" of fictionalized male-shemale anal, oral, and manual sex. The hair, the makeup, the lingerie, the high-heeled shoes, the purses, the stockings, and all the other accoutrements of femininity, breasts included, minus the hideous cunt, are present and accounted for--but with the delightful addition of a second cock and a second pair of balls in lieu of a cunt.



Make a list of your own idiosyncratic interests, preferences, fetishes, perversions, and obsessions. Chances are, it will differ from mine. Maybe you will even give first place to the beauty of the pussy on your list, as I absent the cunt altogether, as ugly, from my own. Then, list the type of stories you normally check out on Literotica. (If you are unaware, as yet, of your own personal interests, preferences, fetishes, perversions, and obsessions, you can identify them by backtracking, as it were, from the types of stories that you read. For example, if you read a lot of gay male fiction, you're obviously interested in sex between men. Ask yourself why. There is a reason; in fact, there are apt to be several reasons.)



Writers, I believe, have a moral obligation to depict the types of sex that they enjoy, even if others are uncomfortable about such activities. That's why the vast majority of my fiction, even that which involves heterosexual couples, includes scenes of anal intercourse, often, in fact, to the exclusion of vaginal intercourse. I love cocks, balls, buttocks, and anuses, so my fiction is full of them (and breasts). By comparison, you will only rarely find detailed descriptions of vaginal intercourse or even of pussies, or, for that matter, cunnilingus. These types of sex are there, but not in profusion. By contrast, nearly every one of my short stories and novels feature anal intercourse, whether between men and women or (as is more often the case, between two men or a man and a shemale).



I celebrate anal intercourse, especially its homosexual variety. In a sense, I rub my reader's face in it. Most of the time, I suspect that my reader has selected such a story to read because he or she also enjoys anal intercourse and, therefore, likes to read about it. I want to sustain such interest.



The reader I'm really after, though, is the man or woman who is curious about anal intercourse but hasn't made up his or her mind yet whether to add it to his or her repertoire (either sexual or imaginative), but who is willing, at least, to try it on for size, so to speak, by reading about fictional characters who are depicted as engaging in, and enjoying, this act. I want to win these readers over.



I want them to come down strongly on the side of anal intercourse as not only desirable in itself but also as preferable to vaginal sex.



Why?



Again, the answer is relatively simple.



I want readers to like what I like. I want them to accept and to enjoy, to celebrate and to endorse my interests and preferences, my orientation and obsessions: circumcised penises; balls; relatively smooth scrotums; feminine asses; men's asses that are sleek, compact, and firm; medium- to small-size tits; Caucasians; and blondes.



I want to disseminate my attitudes, beliefs, biases, dreams, fears, hopes, preferences, prejudices, thoughts, and values through my fiction. In other words, I want my short stories, novels, poems, and essays to inseminate my reader's hearts and minds, that I might recreate, or reproduce, myself in and through them, by sharing my sexual insights and passions with them while, at the same time, recreating these interests and obsessions in their own souls.



Erotica involves sex, and sex, of course, is a means of reproducing the self by generating others who are like oneself and, indeed, who are part of oneself. I am seeding the fertile minds and the fecund hearts of thousands of baby Cals. You may be one among them.



You have been warned.

