[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics

[58_inches_of_hips]

This episode 19 of "Miranda" was truly incredible. I greatly appreciated the introduction of an Indian male character to introduce Miranda to tantric sex through yoga. This magnificent episode serves as a great preview of what we can expect in episode 20 and, perhaps, episode 21 - visually spectacular sexual positions. Congratulations , Juanito Brown, for another excellent job! And you were right; I was certainly very surprised by this direction the series took.

 

[58_inches_of_hips]

Reading porn comics at your girlfriend house is a horrible idea that i don't even dare to think about it lmao..
If i do it she would probably send me to heaven xd

My dear friend Zinédine... My girlfriend and I were working on a university project, since we're law students. I only read chapter 19 of "Miranda" some time after I got home. Got it, bro ?

 

[58_inches_of_hips]

Now I have a question... The name of the new male character in the series "Miranda" is Armando. This is not an Indian name, but rather a name of Germanic origin very common in southern European countries like Portugal, Spain, and Italy. And it's also a very common name here in Latin America. In fact, I have an uncle named Armando. After all, is this new male character an individual of Indian origin or a Latino guy? Because, in my humble opinion, his physical characteristics would be more in line with an Indian ethnic pattern than a Latino ethnic pattern.

 

[Nippur]

I researched this character online and found him quite interesting. I confess I knew nothing about him. Maybe one of the reasons is because I'm young. But I was pleased to learn about the existence of a hero who stars in an Argentine comic book series, a hero created by a Paraguayan screenwriter named Robin Wood. But now I'm curious about something: are you,

 

[58_inches_of_hips]

My dear friend, I must remind you of something: when you post messages here on the forum, do so exclusively in English, to avoid the risk of receiving a warning or punishment. The moderators are very strict about this. And I'm happy to know that there's "un hermano" on this forum. I'm Brazilian.

 

[58_inches_of_hips]

Some here on the forum will probably argue that the simple detail of a name causing ethnic uncertainty won't compromise Juanito Brown's work. Clearly not. But if the current writers of the CRAZYDAD universe intend to add more realism to their stories, certain details deserve due attention.

 

[Rian]

My dear friend Zinédine... My girlfriend and I were working on a university project, since we're law students. I only read chapter 19 of "Miranda" some time after I got home. Got it, bro ?

Hmmm. Law students.
No wonder you like watching claire so much since she is a law judge.

Although I like chloe more, especially the og version.

 

[zidane10]

My dear friend Zinédine... My girlfriend and I were working on a university project, since we're law students. I only read chapter 19 of "Miranda" some time after I got home. Got it, bro ?

Lawyer? That's good. I'll need you when zizou files a lawsuit against me for using his name without permission.

 

[Rian]

You may not like one thing or another, but here’s how I see it: PigKing has its own brand and publishing style, and that won’t always please everyone. For example, you’ve said you don’t like bestiality or gang bang. Me, on the other handmI like them, I find them fun and enjoy those kinds of stories. I respect that you don’t, but that’s your personal choice.
If I used the same terms you use to criticize stories aimed at the LGBTQ audience, for example, it would sound homophobic. In the same way, not liking bestiality, LGBTQ themes, or gang bang shouldn’t become a reason to expect PigKing to stop producing half of their content. They’re not here just to cater to your tastes.
In my view, confusing fantasy with reality is something that comes from people who struggle to interact with the real world. What doesn’t make sense is trying to push a campaign for PigKing to completely change their editorial line. Because let’s be clear: if that ever happened, Frank Romano would definitely struggle to pay the bills at the end of the month.

Dude, where did you find gangbang and LGTBQ mentioned in my post?
I have no problem with any theme or style. I just wish that the makers don't overuse these themes thus making them repetitive.

 

[58_inches_of_hips]

Hmmm. Law students.
No wonder you like watching claire so much since she is a law judge.

Although I like chloe more, especially the og version.

Good morning, dear friend Rian! Good morning here in Brazil, of course! Where you are, in Southeast Asia, it must be late afternoon. Between Judge Claire and housewife Chloe, I prefer Chloe. And I prefer the current Chloe, tremendously robust!

 

[Rian]

Good morning, dear friend Rian! Good morning here in Brazil, of course! Where you are, in Southeast Asia, it must be late afternoon. Between Judge Claire and housewife Chloe, I prefer Chloe. And I prefer the current Chloe, tremendously robust!

I know. I was legpulling.
I also started to like the new version of chloe. I just hope we get more action between her and cody in next chapter instead of jumping back to claire and the old geezer.

 

[Juliano]

Yes. The products have improved a lot. Let's hope Teddy, Frank and Junaito doesn't make the same mistakes which crazydad was notorious for.

Be nice, and maybe crazydad will rewrite the script for Forbidden Desire the way you like it!

 

[DevilsAdvocate]

Dude, where did you find gangbang and LGTBQ mentioned in my post?
I have no problem with any theme or style. I just wish that the makers don't overuse these themes thus making them repetitive.

PigKing covers a variety of themes, and from what I can see, it is quite balanced. There are three renderers, and saying that the theme or genre is repetitive, whether it is Bestiality, gang bang, LGBTQI+ themes, or any other, seems unfair to me. For example, I really enjoy seeing Brandie involved with dogs, and Cinthya with horses and monkeys; I find it very amusing. To me, PigKing is essentially about Bestiality, and this theme does not involve only animals with humans; it is quite broad. Although I find your point a bit inelegant regarding the artist's work, I still understand that it is your opinion.
From what I have noticed, you promote a lot of things you do not actually like. I understand that you may not appreciate certain publications, or that, at times, the story follows lines that seem somewhat dull. There are also situations in the stories, in general, that do not appeal to me. Regarding the gang bang issue, when you imply that the character becomes a neighborhood trash bag, that is your opinion. I believe that, in various passages of Moms Help, this happens, especially during street gang bang parties, turning the character into a sperm receptacle. I am just trying to point out the obvious: I repeat your opinion, even though I do not agree with it.
Although written by a mathematician and logician, or perhaps precisely because of that, The Soviet Man by Alexander Zinoviev is one of the best sociology books ever published. Without reading it, no one can truly understand the functioning of Soviet society or of the many societies that, directly or indirectly, were inspired by it. Among many valuable lessons, the author teaches that in every professional career, whether grand or humble, there are two sets of knowledge, different and mutually inaccessible, that a person must master to achieve any success.
The first, of course, relates to the object or purpose of the task at hand. If someone works in a soap factory, they need to know something about soap; if they are a nurse, something about the human body, diseases, and medications; if a legislator, judge, or lawyer, something about laws. In the case of 3D erotic stories, I believe the author must put in considerable effort to create something worthy of being read; otherwise, PigKing would not have achieved the success he did.
That said, I think that when you criticize the author's work, it means you do not value their effort, simply imposing your own desires and opinions. However, you still explain the reason for your criticism, which is valid. Freedom of expression applies among equals: what an adult says to a child must be limited, and even more so if the child, as a student, is legally required to listen.

 

[Rian]

PigKing covers a variety of themes, and from what I can see, it is quite balanced. There are three renderers, and saying that the theme or genre is repetitive, whether it is Bestiality, gang bang, LGBTQI+ themes, or any other, seems unfair to me. For example, I really enjoy seeing Brandie involved with dogs, and Cinthya with horses and monkeys; I find it very amusing. To me, PigKing is essentially about Bestiality, and this theme does not involve only animals with humans; it is quite broad. Although I find your point a bit inelegant regarding the artist's work, I still understand that it is your opinion.
From what I have noticed, you promote a lot of things you do not actually like. I understand that you may not appreciate certain publications, or that, at times, the story follows lines that seem somewhat dull. There are also situations in the stories, in general, that do not appeal to me. Regarding the gang bang issue, when you imply that the character becomes a neighborhood trash bag, that is your opinion. I believe that, in various passages of Moms Help, this happens, especially during street gang bang parties, turning the character into a sperm receptacle. I am just trying to point out the obvious: I repeat your opinion, even though I do not agree with it.
Although written by a mathematician and logician, or perhaps precisely because of that, The Soviet Man by Alexander Zinoviev is one of the best sociology books ever published. Without reading it, no one can truly understand the functioning of Soviet society or of the many societies that, directly or indirectly, were inspired by it. Among many valuable lessons, the author teaches that in every professional career, whether grand or humble, there are two sets of knowledge, different and mutually inaccessible, that a person must master to achieve any success.
The first, of course, relates to the object or purpose of the task at hand. If someone works in a soap factory, they need to know something about soap; if they are a nurse, something about the human body, diseases, and medications; if a legislator, judge, or lawyer, something about laws. In the case of 3D erotic stories, I believe the author must put in considerable effort to create something worthy of being read; otherwise, PigKing would not have achieved the success he did.
That said, I think that when you criticize the author's work, it means you do not value their effort, simply imposing your own desires and opinions. However, you still explain the reason for your criticism, which is valid. Freedom of expression applies among equals: what an adult says to a child must be limited, and even more so if the child, as a student, is legally required to listen.

Post in thread '[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics'

Sep 13, 2025

Yes. The products have improved a lot. Let's hope Teddy, Frank and Junaito doesn't make the same mistakes which crazydad was notorious for.

Be nice, and maybe crazydad will rewrite the script for Forbidden Desire the way you like it!

• Juliano

• 
• 

Yeah, right.

 

[GHITA]

I don't really know what to say... a new publication, one more

 

[Juliano]

Clhoe and Barney
https://mega.nz/file/i85wjI4T#_8_cxFc-rCXSdj0zTBcCFUCIYp1Y3K6ovTeuBuVQYHc

@Rian

 

[doccop65]

Crazydad's original works were great. Foster Mother, Mother Desire Forbidden, Anny Dear Older Sister, Mom's Help etc were pretty good. But the idea of overusing NTR, bbc, beastiality and finally, turning every woman into neighbouhood cum dump is the reason that almost all the stories became repetitive and boring.

At least that's how I feel.

I can agree that those topics were overused. It's okay to introduce them into a story but they must be kept consistent To the story and not become The story. Once a particular kink is introduced, it's okay to explore it for, say 3 or four isssues. The exceptions, to me were In Foster Mother, Mom's Help and Doctor Brandie. In those titles, it was introduced earlier in the series that Nancy & Sonia, the sisters, grew up on the farm and experimented with sex with the animals as they grew up. That's part of their personalities. For Doctor Brandie, the reason was that she worked in a kennel/shelter (?) and harbored a secret curiosity and lust for sex with dogs. You can easily justify those. In Lost Family, I couldn't see the reasoning behind the FMC desiring and continuously having sex with animals, even if you wanted to use the excuse of the drugged lake water. As it was set up, she should have been all over and continued to be all over her son, who at the time early on, was the only male presence for the first few days of the crash. Clearly, to Me, that's overusing the theme. Even Janine in Family Sins, the topic is a bit overused but not as much as in Lost Family.
I just feel that, in Some cases, the kinks should Not be the focus of the story but a nice way to set up a bit of a change of pace, provided that the writers can plot out future MC behaviors and consequences behind the choices. For the first 3 titles that I mentioned, it's appropriate. For some others, it stretches the believability of the FMCs characters and thus the story.

 

[58_inches_of_hips]

Clhoe and Barney
https://mega.nz/file/i85wjI4T#_8_cxFc-rCXSdj0zTBcCFUCIYp1Y3K6ovTeuBuVQYHc
View attachment 1855826

@Rian

Magnificent animation with one of my favorite female characters. Congratulations !

 

[DevilsAdvocate]

I can agree that those topics were overused. It's okay to introduce them into a story but they must be kept consistent To the story and not become The story. Once a particular kink is introduced, it's okay to explore it for, say 3 or four isssues. The exceptions, to me were In Foster Mother, Mom's Help and Doctor Brandie. In those titles, it was introduced earlier in the series that Nancy & Sonia, the sisters, grew up on the farm and experimented with sex with the animals as they grew up. That's part of their personalities. For Doctor Brandie, the reason was that she worked in a kennel/shelter (?) and harbored a secret curiosity and lust for sex with dogs. You can easily justify those. In Lost Family, I couldn't see the reasoning behind the FMC desiring and continuously having sex with animals, even if you wanted to use the excuse of the drugged lake water. As it was set up, she should have been all over and continued to be all over her son, who at the time early on, was the only male presence for the first few days of the crash. Clearly, to Me, that's overusing the theme. Even Janine in Family Sins, the topic is a bit overused but not as much as in Lost Family.
I just feel that, in Some cases, the kinks should Not be the focus of the story but a nice way to set up a bit of a change of pace, provided that the writers can plot out future MC behaviors and consequences behind the choices. For the first 3 titles that I mentioned, it's appropriate. For some others, it stretches the believability of the FMCs characters and thus the story.

The theme of bestiality was introduced in PigKing’s series and, in practice, ended up being approved by the majority of readers, as it became one of the most recurring fetishes and maintains the interest of a significant part of the audience. It is impossible to ignore that there is demand and that this element has consolidated itself as one of the central aspects for the engagement of the supporter base. In addition, PigKing usually handles this content with a certain balance, without abandoning the main plot.
This discussion about “character credibility” sounds strange when we remember that we are dealing with fictional figures, not real people. It is an exaggerated fiction created precisely to break taboos and entertain within a logic of fantasy. No one in their right mind confuses this with reality. We love our animals as family members, as if they were our children, and precisely for this reason we know very well how to separate real life from the space of imagination. If someone cannot distinguish a 3D narrative from a manual of human behavior, the problem is not with those who consume the work, but with those who insist on confusing fantasy with reality.
It also cannot be denied that at certain times there seems to be an almost deliberate campaign against this theme. However, the truth is that it pleases at least half of PigKing’s supporters. Ignoring this portion would, at the very least, disregard the fan base that finances and sustains the continuity of the work. Reducing the debate to “this is not credible” sounds like demanding psychological realism from characters whose role is precisely to explore aesthetic limits and taboos. It is like asking for historical accuracy in a story with dragons.
The fundamental point is that when this type of fetish is integrated into the plot in a coherent way, whether as part of the characters’ past, as curiosity, or as a desire already justified in context, it works as world building and not as a gratuitous resource. What harms the work is not the theme itself, but its misuse, when it appears out of nowhere without connection to the protagonists’ trajectory. Moderating frequency, providing context, and presenting consequences are strategies that keep the narrative believable within the proposed universe.
In the end, what is asked of the authors is only responsibility, to mark content warnings, to make it clear that it is adult fantasy, and not to abandon the larger plot in the name of a single fetish. From there, the choice belongs to the reader. The essential point is not to lose sight that we are dealing with 3D fictional stories created to entertain an audience that knows very well what it is consuming and that, for the most part, approves of the theme and wants it to remain present.
What is actually observed is that some people want to manipulate what authors should or should not produce. It is even known that certain individuals resort to blackmail, claiming that if stories about a certain character are not created, they will stop supporting PigKing. This clearly shows that there are people who lack authority and even demonstrate serious psychological problems.
In my opinion, authors should be careful with these exaggerated flatteries made with the intention of pleasing a noisy minority. This movement ends up having the opposite effect, displeasing a good portion of loyal supporters. It is important to emphasize that PigKing only reached the level of success it has today because it introduced the theme of bestiality, which consolidated itself and practically became the flagship of the publications.
It is also worth remembering that the stories cover different themes and speak to different audiences. What actually exists is a noisy minority, passionate about certain characters, who cannot separate fiction from reality.

 

[GHITA]

The theme of bestiality was introduced in PigKing’s series and, in practice, ended up being approved by the majority of readers, as it became one of the most recurring fetishes and maintains the interest of a significant part of the audience. It is impossible to ignore that there is demand and that this element has consolidated itself as one of the central aspects for the engagement of the supporter base. In addition, PigKing usually handles this content with a certain balance, without abandoning the main plot.
This discussion about “character credibility” sounds strange when we remember that we are dealing with fictional figures, not real people. It is an exaggerated fiction created precisely to break taboos and entertain within a logic of fantasy. No one in their right mind confuses this with reality. We love our animals as family members, as if they were our children, and precisely for this reason we know very well how to separate real life from the space of imagination. If someone cannot distinguish a 3D narrative from a manual of human behavior, the problem is not with those who consume the work, but with those who insist on confusing fantasy with reality.
It also cannot be denied that at certain times there seems to be an almost deliberate campaign against this theme. However, the truth is that it pleases at least half of PigKing’s supporters. Ignoring this portion would, at the very least, disregard the fan base that finances and sustains the continuity of the work. Reducing the debate to “this is not credible” sounds like demanding psychological realism from characters whose role is precisely to explore aesthetic limits and taboos. It is like asking for historical accuracy in a story with dragons.
The fundamental point is that when this type of fetish is integrated into the plot in a coherent way, whether as part of the characters’ past, as curiosity, or as a desire already justified in context, it works as world building and not as a gratuitous resource. What harms the work is not the theme itself, but its misuse, when it appears out of nowhere without connection to the protagonists’ trajectory. Moderating frequency, providing context, and presenting consequences are strategies that keep the narrative believable within the proposed universe.
In the end, what is asked of the authors is only responsibility, to mark content warnings, to make it clear that it is adult fantasy, and not to abandon the larger plot in the name of a single fetish. From there, the choice belongs to the reader. The essential point is not to lose sight that we are dealing with 3D fictional stories created to entertain an audience that knows very well what it is consuming and that, for the most part, approves of the theme and wants it to remain present.
What is actually observed is that some people want to manipulate what authors should or should not produce. It is even known that certain individuals resort to blackmail, claiming that if stories about a certain character are not created, they will stop supporting PigKing. This clearly shows that there are people who lack authority and even demonstrate serious psychological problems.
In my opinion, authors should be careful with these exaggerated flatteries made with the intention of pleasing a noisy minority. This movement ends up having the opposite effect, displeasing a good portion of loyal supporters. It is important to emphasize that PigKing only reached the level of success it has today because it introduced the theme of bestiality, which consolidated itself and practically became the flagship of the publications.
It is also worth remembering that the stories cover different themes and speak to different audiences. What actually exists is a noisy minority, passionate about certain characters, who cannot separate fiction from reality.

I completely agree with a large part of your analysis. Personally, I am a fan of bestiality, BDSM and am only satisfied with the few publications that deal with this theme, notably LF, FM, I do not want to influence the authors and especially not blackmail. I much prefer to have the surprise of the scenario and have a real discovery. That is also, for me, the interest of comics.