• Staff Applications are OPEN! [ Staff / Moderator ] More Info HERE Help us make a better forum for everyone!

[PigKing/CrazyDad] Discussion / Controversies and Fan Service.

I agree. It's probably the subscribers of Pigking who doesn’t like FIL x DIL, father daughter and even mother son scenarios.
If you notice there has been a significant increase in bestiality and bbc trope which I'm certain is due to how the patreon or wherever else pigking is.....doesn’t want more chapters based onto those scenarios.


It shouldn’t. But don't you think that there has been a lack of the scenarios I mentioned above?
And a significant increase in bestiality and bbc?
Look I'm not saying those are bad. I just wish there was a proper balance between all kinds of stories, like you often point out.

Sorry, honestly, I don't think so... what you're referring to, 4 or 5 publications: FM, LF, FLAH, Amanda, and maybe Dr. B. (Admittedly, these are among the most popular series, at least when you look at the statistics), but out of all the publications, that's still very few. Of course, I'm only mentioning those where I consider it to be the main theme and not just a plot twist.

The central theme of the PK universe is incest, and it accounts for 80% of the stories. Does that bother me? No, I simply find that often it would be enough to just change the characters' faces, given how similar the storylines are. So I'm all for diversity and anything that surprises me.
 
Sorry, honestly, I don't think so... what you're referring to, 4 or 5 publications: FM, LF, FLAH, Amanda, and maybe Dr. B. (Admittedly, these are among the most popular series, at least when you look at the statistics), but out of all the publications, that's still very few. Of course, I'm only mentioning those where I consider it to be the main theme and not just a plot twist.

The central theme of the PK universe is incest, and it accounts for 80% of the stories. Does that bother me? No, I simply find that often it would be enough to just change the characters' faces, given how similar the storylines are. So I'm all for diversity and anything that surprises me.
I'm not saying bestiality or bbc bothers me.
What bothers me is that there is a significant lack of black women X white men and In laws scenarios.🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
The worst thing amongst these is leaving a scenario unfinished. Just check the last chapter of F.S and the one before that and tell me if that not a clickbait.😮‍💨
 
Last edited:
I agree. It's probably the subscribers of Pigking who doesn’t like FIL x DIL, father daughter and even mother son scenarios.
If you notice there has been a significant increase in bestiality and bbc trope which I'm certain is due to how the patreon or wherever else pigking is.....doesn’t want more chapters based onto those scenarios.


It shouldn’t. But don't you think that there has been a lack of the scenarios I mentioned above?
And a significant increase in bestiality and bbc?
Look I'm not saying those are bad. I just wish there was a proper balance between all kinds of stories, like you often point out.
So, according to your perception, brother, the incest theme is experiencing a decline, in favor of a more intense exploration of bestiality and big black cocks? My friend Rian, this doesn't please me at all...
 
So, according to your perception, brother, the incest theme is experiencing a decline, in favor of a more intense exploration of bestiality and big black cocks? My friend Rian, this doesn't please me at all...
I think you misunderstood my words.
I'm displeased with scenarios ending offscreen like they did with recent Family Sins.
Heck, even forbidden desire 36 has a similar situation where the new chapter abruptly ended claire's sex scene from the morning and jumped into afternoon.
Although I'm glad that chloe and cody's scene didn't got cut like that, but still
And my forever criticism of the lack of black women having sex with white men and In Laws scenarios will remain forever.😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨
 
I don't trust the viewership statistics on the official website.
I don't believe that the episode "Mom's Help – Part 80," published two days ago, has fewer views than the recently published episode "Suky-Tu – Part 03."
There's some kind of view manipulation going on.

View attachment 2000515
It's Been manipulative for awhile now, or at least it seems that way. Pigking reps would come on here, give the song and dance about how they're losing money to sites like these. At one point, they'd convinced people to stop posting content altogether. When myself and others challenged that what they were doing was manipulation, they became accusatory and hostile. I called them on their bs. I said that, from a finacial standpoint, they Couldn't be losing money. Between having Specialized subscriptions of a minimum 60 USD, controlling & limiting even Paid content, Plus putting out a new title seemingly every quarter, while having over 80 titles, a number of which were incomplete due to "increased workloads", that they couldn't Possibly be losing money. Even if you're not an economics major, Common Sense tells you that, if you're losing money you'd A) consolidate your business, meaning that you'd be abandoning many titles for only the most popular And Profitable ones (which is what many Other businesses Do when facing financial hardships. Why do you think that so many business with multiple products/stores/ventures close/discontinue a number of franchises or products?) and B) if you'e Losing money, there'd be No Way you'd be hiring additional people because 'your workload increased'. The last part, right There, tells you that business is booming unless you have the reading comprehensive skills of a 3rd grader or you can't add 2+2=4 or 1+3=4!!
Nah, those of us with common Business sense knows manipilation when we see/hear it and the Fallback Typical of those types when they've lost the common sense battle or called out for being deceptive, is to go silent, withhold a product for a time to drive up demand/popularity, then dole out the product in bits or in this case, give you a 10 panel preview of random story renders. It's how they plan to win and show the customers that They're smarter than their consumers. Trying to change points of view of a product by good or bad coersion, bullying and/or withholding or lengthily delaying and in a couple of cases, skipping some chapters for public comsumption, said machinations ARE manipulation, no matterr How you cut it. A lot of people like to be led like sheep. It's why the term 'Herd Mentality" was created. I don't fall into that category. I was taught by family members to challenge Everything since I was 12 (and I'm pushing close to 70 now!) because, as I would later begin to find out that, a Lie is Nothing to tell where power and money is concerned.

P.S. THEY know that the stats are public. It's easy to change figures to suit your needs which is why you pay attention to everything, not just one or two. Obfuscation is the number one tactic of scammers. I know. As a former LE officer, I learned that crime statistics were altered for certain communities or towns to appear "Safe" while making other communities/towns appear a lot more dangerous than they Actually Were!
 
Last edited:
chloe cortés hardesty.jpg
 
And I liked, Rian, what Ghita said about Johnson, Cynthia's father and Janine's father-in-law, about Ghita considering him an "omnipresent villain", whose aura hangs over the series "Lost Family" and probably also over the series "Family Sins", as if the character Johnson were a supreme entity of Evil, like the Ahriman of Zoroastrianism, but made of flesh and blood.
But I still think, Rian, that our Claire is even worse than Johnson, because of her hypocrisy. Johnson's villainy is explicit, while Claire's is difficult to identify, even for readers of "Forbidden Desire - Remake". Claire's wickedness is more insidious.
 
And I liked, Rian, what Ghita said about Johnson, Cynthia's father and Janine's father-in-law, about Ghita considering him an "omnipresent villain", whose aura hangs over the series "Lost Family" and probably also over the series "Family Sins", as if the character Johnson were a supreme entity of Evil, like the Ahriman of Zoroastrianism, but made of flesh and blood.
But I still think, Rian, that our Claire is even worse than Johnson, because of her hypocrisy. Johnson's villainy is explicit, while Claire's is difficult to identify, even for readers of "Forbidden Desire - Remake". Claire's wickedness is more insidious.
Yes. It would've been great if(only if 😮‍💨) someone from the creative team of that series would actually decide to make things more dramatic.
Because let's be honest. All crazydad3d comics are totally bland with zero suspense or stuff that can keep the readers hooked.🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
 
And I liked, Rian, what Ghita said about Johnson, Cynthia's father and Janine's father-in-law, about Ghita considering him an "omnipresent villain", whose aura hangs over the series "Lost Family" and probably also over the series "Family Sins", as if the character Johnson were a supreme entity of Evil, like the Ahriman of Zoroastrianism, but made of flesh and blood.
But I still think, Rian, that our Claire is even worse than Johnson, because of her hypocrisy. Johnson's villainy is explicit, while Claire's is difficult to identify, even for readers of "Forbidden Desire - Remake". Claire's wickedness is more insidious.

Oh, look at that ! I've never read this series, but now that you mention there's a "villain," maybe I'll force myself a little and give it a try. I've always liked "negative" characters; I find them more complex. Thx @58_inches_of_hips
 
Oh, look at that ! I've never read this series, but now that you mention there's a "villain," maybe I'll force myself a little and give it a try. I've always liked "negative" characters; I find them more complex. Thx @58_inches_of_hips
Hey Ghita. If you had to pick one character from forbidden desire series to be a villain then who would it be?
 
Hey Ghita. If you had to pick one character from forbidden desire series to be a villain then who would it be?
Actually, to be perfectly honest, I've never really followed this series and I don't know the characters, but if Johnson is a villain in a series, they should choose a character with a different profile... so why not a woman ? A rivalry between sisters that becomes toxic, for example, or between a mother and daughters. Who knows ?
 
Don't worry about that, my dear Adèle Exarchopoulos!
But I'm warning you, Ghita, that Claire isn't a villain in the conventional or traditional sense, like Johnson. Claire exercises her villainy through hypocrisy. She adopts an affable demeanor and a respectable, helpful posture to conceal how wicked she is. Claire has sex with her father Barney, a physically abject character, and when she discovers that her sister Chloe is doing the same thing, Claire vehemently criticizes Chloe, from her pedestal of austerity, arrogantly stating that Chloe is sexually abusing Barney, an elderly man cognitively impaired by Alzheimer's.
 
But I'm warning you, Ghita, that Claire isn't a villain in the conventional or traditional sense, like Johnson. Claire exercises her villainy through hypocrisy. She adopts an affable demeanor and a respectable, helpful posture to conceal how wicked she is. Claire has sex with her father Barney, a physically abject character, and when she discovers that her sister Chloe is doing the same thing, Claire vehemently criticizes Chloe, from her pedestal of austerity, arrogantly stating that Chloe is sexually abusing Barney, an elderly man cognitively impaired by Alzheimer's.
That is 💯 correct.
Actually, to be perfectly honest, I've never really followed this series and I don't know the characters, but if Johnson is a villain in a series, they should choose a character with a different profile... so why not a woman ? A rivalry between sisters that becomes toxic, for example, or between a mother and daughters. Who knows ?
Yep. Wish @TeddyPigking would notice these conversations and make some changes into Forbidden desire series; especially the design of that goblin barney, and the story angle as it is way to bland.🤷🏽‍♂️😮‍💨
 
But I'm warning you, Ghita, that Claire isn't a villain in the conventional or traditional sense, like Johnson. Claire exercises her villainy through hypocrisy. She adopts an affable demeanor and a respectable, helpful posture to conceal how wicked she is. Claire has sex with her father Barney, a physically abject character, and when she discovers that her sister Chloe is doing the same thing, Claire vehemently criticizes Chloe, from her pedestal of austerity, arrogantly stating that Chloe is sexually abusing Barney, an elderly man cognitively impaired by Alzheimer's.

Thank you the precision (y), as I said, I don't follow this series 😁
 
Thought of the day : There was a time when PK published just about anything (weekends included), now it's Tuesday to Friday at best... typical civil servants 😂 😂 😂 😂
 
Back
Top Bottom