Jabcomix

[Modok]

Fantasies can have real consequences and desensitize or distort your image (in this case consuming material like this en masse may convince you that toddlers are sexually attracted to adults and would like to engage in sexual acts with them) it's not that clear cut like fantasies don't hurt anyone - in the Epstein files you can see photos of Lolita quotes on bodies obviously romanticizing sex with young girls. While the source material shows the protagonist as an obviously deeply disturbed and sick person.

Sure, but as a society we've been collectively guilty of making that socially acceptable until recently. The Japanese still have a thriving underground market for the sailor schoolgirl uniforms for example, in the western world our equivalent would be the catholic schoolgirl or the cheerleader - hell, even in these heady days where any degree of finding women sexually desirable is an act of misogyny, we've found a way through the mental gymnastics of it to ok and even normalise, fetishise even the casual usage of the word "daddy".

Are we really surprised when the most popular content on the internet today in terms of porn is incest content for both men and women?

(I'm not condemning anyone here by the way - you do you as long as you're not ACTUALLY harming anyone, I'm just saying that sooner or later you do indeed eventually realise that the escalation of your fantasies kind of fucks you up in a very real way.)

 

[MrSteed]

I don't think this material makes anyone a pedo, but it may very well normalize it for people that already inclined toward that attraction. Not everyone that finds underage girls/boys attractive is an active pedo, but does this content provide an outlet and/or encourage those feelings?

 

[American Goth]

Jesus. The pearl clutching in this thread.

If this comic or kink aint for you then go somewhere else.

 

[BigBangAttack]

oh yea, I'd really be concerned about the legal system if they didn't think this type of art is a problem even if the artists say they are 18+.
but I was just talking about threads like this or F95.
for example DirDogma has shota stuff, and I don't think you can even mention the name in F95 much less post anything. but then there's this and mods don't care about it.
I was just wondering why some Loli/Shota stuff are allowed in sites like these and why some are

Legally speaking its not a problem. And in fact, the united states specifically, since 2010, has ruled that, unless a piece of art is indistinguishible from a real child or has used a real child as visual reference, then it is incostitutional to sue over it as its legally recgonized as something protected by freedom of artistic expression.

it can still be prosecuted for other things, but not for the topic or content. Only way some states can legally bar anyone from doing anything is if that state has something like obscenity laws, where the crime would be distribution of pornography in general.

Despite its legality, americans can just decide if they want it on their site or not, its up to them, thats why some places will just not have it, if its allowed here then its allowed and they are free to choose to allow it. That being said, there is the issue of hosting, as despite being americans, the owners of a website have to abide to the laws of the place physically hosting the site. F95 is hosted in Belize, where it is EXTREMELY illegal to have that kind of thing. thats why its not allowed there, they'll go to jail if they have any of that in the site.

Fantasies can have real consequences and desensitize or distort your image (in this case consuming material like this en masse may convince you that toddlers are sexually attracted to adults and would like to engage in sexual acts with them) it's not that clear cut like fantasies don't hurt anyone - in the Epstein files you can see photos of Lolita quotes on bodies obviously romanticizing sex with young girls. While the source material shows the protagonist as an obviously deeply disturbed and sick person.

The entire field of psychology disagrees with you, as fantasies are often encouraged both as a healthy outlet and as a coping mechanism for people who have gone through sexual abuse. Because the human mind doesn't work like that. Turns out humans are actually really good at telling apart reality from fiction, who knew.

Epstein didn't have lolita quotes because Lolita affected him (specially since lolita is an anti-pedo story that very clearly condems them), he had quotes everywhere because he was a proud pedophile selling actual literal children to every single celebrity and world leader you can imagine. Its not fiction affecting reality, it was a pedo using it as branding to excite his clients.




The part of all of this that surprises me in this forum is that Julia and Sharona (and by extension every character around their age in these comics) are middle and high schoolers. These characters have been minors since the beginning over 20 years ago, Jab is just drawing them closer to their canon age now.

 

[CarmineBee]

I've just seen page11 thumbnail and..... /facepalm!

but no surprise with Jab

 

[MrSteed]

she doesn't have all her adult teeth in.

 

[Emilyvt]

That’s a better direction

 

[Gilberto2006]

Ah, the glory days, back when my hands were young and what I drew was appreciated more. Yes, you're the only one among these whiny crybabies who understands, bravo to you. I provide the fix that gooners desire, and they pay well.

I wrote a response to all this whining earlier but it needed to pass moderator approval first, so I didn't bother, but it's nice to see amidst all the beggars and whiners for freebies, that there exists one person with a brain.

Content requires money. Money pays for content. As time develops, sometimes your fanbase changes, their tastes and desires change, or perhaps you develop a new fanbase while the old one keeps whining while expecting endless freebies.

I have a right to be paid for my work. I have a right to demand payment for my work. And I have a right to endlessly scorn people who scrutinize my basic rights because they, who lack all skill in drawing and never produce worthy content themselves, seem to believe that they are entitled to my work without ever paying for it, and some believe they can subscribe for one month, attempt to pilfer all my art and then pass it around to beggars and thieves.

Gooners who pay will always have more say over what's produced, as opposed to gooners who don't.


As an aside, I take a special pleasure in inserting things you don't like, into things you do like, "ruining" the things you love because you keep trying to pilfer my art and goon on it without supporting me in the slightest, and you make it a point of pride to pilfer my art without paying for it, as if you're doing some service to everyone by depriving me of my rightful payment for my work. My content has a price, and nobody forces you to watch it, but you keep pursuing it and you demand to see it without paying for it. All the while, complaining about it while not paying for it.

You truly are a cesspool of hypocritical degenerates, and all of you would be shunned and thoroughly despised by normal society, but I find it amusing that you have the audacity to criticize me so vengefully when I put a paywall behind the content I've produced that you so eagerly lust for.


Well, perhaps if you WERE paying customers, I might be obliged to consider your concerns and make something tailored to what you PAY for. As it stands, you don't pay for it, and therefore have no right to complain about it. Those who DO pay...well, the content speaks for itself.

How often does the content your paying gooners enjoy overlap with the content your non-paying gooners do not? I've always been curious if the random fruit & veggie vendor Helen fucks in Dat Ass 2 (which I paid to subscribe for) all those years back, was to satisfy people seeking it or punish people who weren't.

 

[BlacSmith]

Ah, the glory days, back when my hands were young and what I drew was appreciated more. Yes, you're the only one among these whiny crybabies who understands, bravo to you. I provide the fix that gooners desire, and they pay well.

I wrote a response to all this whining earlier but it needed to pass moderator approval first, so I didn't bother, but it's nice to see amidst all the beggars and whiners for freebies, that there exists one person with a brain.

Content requires money. Money pays for content. As time develops, sometimes your fanbase changes, their tastes and desires change, or perhaps you develop a new fanbase while the old one keeps whining while expecting endless freebies.

I have a right to be paid for my work. I have a right to demand payment for my work. And I have a right to endlessly scorn people who scrutinize my basic rights because they, who lack all skill in drawing and never produce worthy content themselves, seem to believe that they are entitled to my work without ever paying for it, and some believe they can subscribe for one month, attempt to pilfer all my art and then pass it around to beggars and thieves.

Gooners who pay will always have more say over what's produced, as opposed to gooners who don't.


As an aside, I take a special pleasure in inserting things you don't like, into things you do like, "ruining" the things you love because you keep trying to pilfer my art and goon on it without supporting me in the slightest, and you make it a point of pride to pilfer my art without paying for it, as if you're doing some service to everyone by depriving me of my rightful payment for my work. My content has a price, and nobody forces you to watch it, but you keep pursuing it and you demand to see it without paying for it. All the while, complaining about it while not paying for it.

You truly are a cesspool of hypocritical degenerates, and all of you would be shunned and thoroughly despised by normal society, but I find it amusing that you have the audacity to criticize me so vengefully when I put a paywall behind the content I've produced that you so eagerly lust for.


Well, perhaps if you WERE paying customers, I might be obliged to consider your concerns and make something tailored to what you PAY for. As it stands, you don't pay for it, and therefore have no right to complain about it. Those who DO pay...well, the content speaks for itself.

If this is the real Jab, I just want to say that I used to be a paying subscriber, but your art and storylines took a massive nose dive when Laz left. I would love for your work to be as good as it once was, it might even get me to pay for it again. But as it stands, your current stuff is a pale imitation of what you once were

 

[Mazstar]

Ah, the glory days, back when my hands were young and what I drew was appreciated more. Yes, you're the only one among these whiny crybabies who understands, bravo to you. I provide the fix that gooners desire, and they pay well.

I wrote a response to all this whining earlier but it needed to pass moderator approval first, so I didn't bother, but it's nice to see amidst all the beggars and whiners for freebies, that there exists one person with a brain.

Content requires money. Money pays for content. As time develops, sometimes your fanbase changes, their tastes and desires change, or perhaps you develop a new fanbase while the old one keeps whining while expecting endless freebies.

I have a right to be paid for my work. I have a right to demand payment for my work. And I have a right to endlessly scorn people who scrutinize my basic rights because they, who lack all skill in drawing and never produce worthy content themselves, seem to believe that they are entitled to my work without ever paying for it, and some believe they can subscribe for one month, attempt to pilfer all my art and then pass it around to beggars and thieves.

Gooners who pay will always have more say over what's produced, as opposed to gooners who don't.


As an aside, I take a special pleasure in inserting things you don't like, into things you do like, "ruining" the things you love because you keep trying to pilfer my art and goon on it without supporting me in the slightest, and you make it a point of pride to pilfer my art without paying for it, as if you're doing some service to everyone by depriving me of my rightful payment for my work. My content has a price, and nobody forces you to watch it, but you keep pursuing it and you demand to see it without paying for it. All the while, complaining about it while not paying for it.

You truly are a cesspool of hypocritical degenerates, and all of you would be shunned and thoroughly despised by normal society, but I find it amusing that you have the audacity to criticize me so vengefully when I put a paywall behind the content I've produced that you so eagerly lust for.


Well, perhaps if you WERE paying customers, I might be obliged to consider your concerns and make something tailored to what you PAY for. As it stands, you don't pay for it, and therefore have no right to complain about it. Those who DO pay...well, the content speaks for itself.

You're right about deserving to be paid for your work. But even though we're the beggars and thieves - we are still your target audience, and you further alienate a big part of it by doing the stuff we whine about. That's direct feedback from your target group - your decision what to do with it. The content that is leaked is also partially marketing for you, but if potential customers don't like it and you make it a point of us not liking it, we'll never become paying customers and you'll lose clients in the long run.

More than once I considered subscribing, but the bad quality of stories, decreasing quality of art style, the boring existing story lines currently being updated, and the focus on Loli content combined with your despicable world view just make it not attractive for me to support you. I guess you found your niche with MAGA pdfl content, hope it's enough to support your life.

 

[infnx123]

Legally speaking its not a problem. And in fact, the united states specifically, since 2010, has ruled that, unless a piece of art is indistinguishible from a real child or has used a real child as visual reference, then it is incostitutional to sue over it as its legally recgonized as something protected by freedom of artistic expression.

it can still be prosecuted for other things, but not for the topic or content. Only way some states can legally bar anyone from doing anything is if that state has something like obscenity laws, where the crime would be distribution of pornography in general.

Despite its legality, americans can just decide if they want it on their site or not, its up to them, thats why some places will just not have it, if its allowed here then its allowed and they are free to choose to allow it. That being said, there is the issue of hosting, as despite being americans, the owners of a website have to abide to the laws of the place physically hosting the site. F95 is hosted in Belize, where it is EXTREMELY illegal to have that kind of thing. thats why its not allowed there, they'll go to jail if they have any of that in the site.


The entire field of psychology disagrees with you, as fantasies are often encouraged both as a healthy outlet and as a coping mechanism for people who have gone through sexual abuse. Because the human mind doesn't work like that. Turns out humans are actually really good at telling apart reality from fiction, who knew.

Epstein didn't have lolita quotes because Lolita affected him (specially since lolita is an anti-pedo story that very clearly condems them), he had quotes everywhere because he was a proud pedophile selling actual literal children to every single celebrity and world leader you can imagine. Its not fiction affecting reality, it was a pedo using it as branding to excite his clients.




The part of all of this that surprises me in this forum is that Julia and Sharona (and by extension every character around their age in these comics) are middle and high schoolers. These characters have been minors since the beginning over 20 years ago, Jab is just drawing them closer to their canon age now.

OHHH. I get it. Thanks

 

[Garak3D]

You truly are a cesspool of hypocritical degenerates, and all of you would be shunned and thoroughly despised by normal society.

This guy gets me.

 

[Gilberto2006]

You truly are a cesspool of hypocritical degenerates, and all of you would be shunned and thoroughly despised by normal society.