The funny thing with this kind of AI slop is... It cannot be copyrighted. So they would shoot themselves in the foot with that. With traditional porn, at least it is illegal to share. But with AI, it suddenly is totally legal to share here. And since this AI shit basically always looks the same, there is even less reason for people to buy it. If you want AI slop, there are thousands of wannabes out there that mass-produce it.
Agreed, and that...and I do mean that is my major concern nogui. There was no disrespect to your post, none what so ever. I was only commenting on the style of it.
Case in point, if you look at Cargi older stuff...wow and I do mean wow interms of quality. But, the new stuff is...ok. And that has been the main issue I have seen a lot with hand drawn stuff. While some artists have stayed consistant. A lot have stuff that a few years back wouldn't be up to the level.
My comments on this and AI has been that atleast the quailty of the drawings have been more a tune to what we use to get, like with Fernando, who sadly went away. The only thing I like about AI, is that they just look a lot more clean.
I know that may sound odd, but I was comparing Cargi old stuff to their new stuff, and I feel, ironically that the new stuff looks more computer generated compared to the new stuff.
I get why people are a bit upset and the discussion about it, including that from Sir Timothy-Robert was a good one. Without guard rails AI will be bad. But when done right, man....one has to atleast give respest to the quailty output.
And once again, nogui, you hit it on the head, if it cannot be copyrighted, then the fear is that it will lead to less original an new talent.
I hope that makes any sense and thank you all for your feedback both like and dislike thumbs. That's how we learn from others POV.
