[Fansadox/DoFantasy] Collection of Comics

Anna Shapard said:
are they REALLY expecting us to pay for AI Slop?!?
Click to expand...
This - rightful - comment leads to a Discussion... Like I still prefer well drawn 2D Art to 3D and now AI any Time ever since. And like 2/3rds of "Likes" on AllPornComix go to 3D Output anyway. BUT: we won`t stop the Progress. It`s going on massively everywhere - at least a 3rd of youtube stuff pimped up with AI-Fakes to get Attention... And by the Way: some exceptional Folks use AI in a bright Way - beyond Teen-Face-Big-Tits-Big-Ass-Bimbo-Lips Stereotypes... Please consider.

I recommend a Discussion Thread on this.

But here I`m looking for new FS Stuff - and found a Lot lately! THX to all you dear Posters!!! So please... Post Content
 
Last edited:
Anna Shapard said:
are they REALLY expecting us to pay for AI Slop?!?
Click to expand...
If it's by that George guy, I echo the sentiment.
Comes across as very low effort quick cash grab. I complained about it in the past, but was surprised how many people eat that slop for breakfast.
If you really want to enjoy AI artwork, go play a Ren'Py game, it makes better use of the technology and also animates the scenes.
 
I kinda like it, and for sure it's AI but that's here to stay, at least he's open about it. Imho it's the same as the evolution from pen/paper to digital drawings.
I don't care which tool is used, if someone can do it better than me than I call that a success.

O and on a side note: you can't complain about art, at most you can make suggestions for (in your eyes) improvements. Nobody forces you to look at it, so if you don't like it: ignore it. (Especially on a forum that's about free sharing ;) )
 
The funny thing with this kind of AI slop is... It cannot be copyrighted. So they would shoot themselves in the foot with that. With traditional porn, at least it is illegal to share. But with AI, it suddenly is totally legal to share here. And since this AI shit basically always looks the same, there is even less reason for people to buy it. If you want AI slop, there are thousands of wannabes out there that mass-produce it.
 
nogui said:
The funny thing with this kind of AI slop is... It cannot be copyrighted. So they would shoot themselves in the foot with that. With traditional porn, at least it is illegal to share. But with AI, it suddenly is totally legal to share here.
Click to expand...
Even if that's true for the AI generated images, it is not true for the story as a whole and for the text. So the work as a whole is of course still protected by copyright.

That said, it looks a lot worse than traditional art, the facial expressions are ridiculous and often don't match the current scene and yeah, it looks all the same. At least he got rid of the many continuity errors in the later parts: In Part 1, the clothing (boots? corset?) and the way the victim was bound would regularly change between panels.
 
Well.. I watched these two pdf's and it's something strange. At every page my brain is crying: "Drop It! It's a slop!", I see every moment, when the prompter wanted to make a scaried women, but in result there was a horny women with ahegao face. But in fact the plot is better then Cagri for example. Not a big destination but still.
 
By the way, how do you manage to tell if a comic is drawn by AI or human?
For me, I find it hard to tell the differences.
 
nogui said:
The funny thing with this kind of AI slop is... It cannot be copyrighted. So they would shoot themselves in the foot with that. With traditional porn, at least it is illegal to share. But with AI, it suddenly is totally legal to share here. And since this AI shit basically always looks the same, there is even less reason for people to buy it. If you want AI slop, there are thousands of wannabes out there that mass-produce it.
Click to expand...
Agreed, and that...and I do mean that is my major concern nogui. There was no disrespect to your post, none what so ever. I was only commenting on the style of it.

Case in point, if you look at Cargi older stuff...wow and I do mean wow interms of quality. But, the new stuff is...ok. And that has been the main issue I have seen a lot with hand drawn stuff. While some artists have stayed consistant. A lot have stuff that a few years back wouldn't be up to the level.

My comments on this and AI has been that atleast the quailty of the drawings have been more a tune to what we use to get, like with Fernando, who sadly went away. The only thing I like about AI, is that they just look a lot more clean.

I know that may sound odd, but I was comparing Cargi old stuff to their new stuff, and I feel, ironically that the new stuff looks more computer generated compared to the new stuff.

I get why people are a bit upset and the discussion about it, including that from Sir Timothy-Robert was a good one. Without guard rails AI will be bad. But when done right, man....one has to atleast give respest to the quailty output.

And once again, nogui, you hit it on the head, if it cannot be copyrighted, then the fear is that it will lead to less original an new talent.

I hope that makes any sense and thank you all for your feedback both like and dislike thumbs. That's how we learn from others POV. :)
 
sgal83 said:
By the way, how do you manage to tell if a comic is drawn by AI or human?
For me, I find it hard to tell the differences.
Click to expand...
It has a lot to do with the style.

For example, if you look at AI drawning, after a while many see similar patterns emerging over and over. This is one concern compared to hand drawn. But, once again, a lot of people had the same thing said about things made by hand vs by machine in other fields.

With hand drawn, there are always those imperfections that you rarely find in AI. Mostly because the new stuff, is made to look perfect, without flaws.
 
They are aware. It's not really hard to find this forum. So them being unaware would be very, very surprising.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top