• Staff Applications are OPEN! [ Staff / Moderator ] More Info HERE Help us make a better forum for everyone!

[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics

99.png
 

Attachments

  • Lost Family 43_3.pdf
    Lost Family 43_3.pdf
    3 MB · Views: 7
It's absolutely perfect! Wonderful job (even though I was starting to get nervous out of habit!😅).❤️❤️
But if you're looking to level up your Claire fan art, let me share a tip from someone who’s been doing this for ages. 😊 The most important thing with Claire is keeping her facial features intact, as that's her best feature. Playing with the contrast of the cheekbones, lips, and hair is crucial, but nailing the color palette can be tricky—trust me, I know—so don't worry if it doesn't look right on the first shot. Let me show you an example of how it's supposed to look. @LoveTaboo👍
UCL.jpg
 
Last edited:
What do you think of this one? lol
Even if she doesn’t look like herself (no one ever does), it hurts to see her in that state. 😔 Though I’d be a hypocrite to say so, considering I just drew fanart of her like that. Why, Claire? Why must I be so misguided, so conflicted? Is it because I’m incredibly jealous of you? Is it because whenever this happens, something even worse comes along, and there's no stopping it? Why, Claire? I truly hope I'm not letting you down.😞
 
brave_screenshot_freeadultcomix.com.png
Frank Romano is a professional who doesn't care in the slightest about criticism. No matter how bad his work is, the guy makes absolutely no effort to try and improve its quality. And I’m not even talking about a lack of hardware, because he has plenty of that. It seems like the guy just flipped the "I don't give a fuck" switch and literally couldn't care less about the audience.

Those onomatopoeias filled with doodles and gimmicks that he insists on using simply do not connect with the straight audience. For this demographic, something more explicit and realistic is required: explicit penetration scenes with a comprehensive zoom, plenty of skin texture, photographic effects showing vaginal fluids, and no over-the-top onomatopoeias—just discrete words. The worst part is that, in reality, there are no actual explicit sex scenes; what he delivers are just static images that imply penetration, leaving the visuals looking clunky and artificial.

I bet he must be paying Teddy very well, especially since Juanito Brown was fired. In this context, on top of not knowing how to build convincing stories, the guy still manages to butcher a piece of work that, in theory, is supposed to be aimed at a heterosexual audience. He insists on creating throwaway chapters that have already proven to be completely ineffective and hollow to the reader. I doubt even the LGBTQIA+ audience is satisfied with this format, yet he still complains about the lack of supporters. He surely must think his target audience is made up of suckers and fools.

An erotic work should be designed to give the reader a convincing fictional experience that triggers a reaction. If the author fails to engage with the target audience, either he knows absolutely nothing about the subject matter or he is trying to act like some avant-garde artist. Frank Romano doesn't create art; what he makes doesn't resonate with the audience, let alone arouse any kind of eroticism in people.

Frankly, if Frank Romano wants to increase his number of supporters, I think some self-criticism would be a good start. He needs to try talking more with the people at the receiving end of production: the audience. He needs to bring actual explicit scenes instead of mere implications, simple and discrete onomatopoeias of an appropriate size, and a more slice-of-life approach regarding the characters. There needs to be continuity in their daily lives to create a more immersive world-building narrative, giving real life to the plot instead of sticking to these throwaway, repetitive, and bland little stories.
 
View attachment 2635762Frank Romano is a professional who doesn't care in the slightest about criticism. No matter how bad his work is, the guy makes absolutely no effort to try and improve its quality. And I’m not even talking about a lack of hardware, because he has plenty of that. It seems like the guy just flipped the "I don't give a fuck" switch and literally couldn't care less about the audience.

Those onomatopoeias filled with doodles and gimmicks that he insists on using simply do not connect with the straight audience. For this demographic, something more explicit and realistic is required: explicit penetration scenes with a comprehensive zoom, plenty of skin texture, photographic effects showing vaginal fluids, and no over-the-top onomatopoeias—just discrete words. The worst part is that, in reality, there are no actual explicit sex scenes; what he delivers are just static images that imply penetration, leaving the visuals looking clunky and artificial.

I bet he must be paying Teddy very well, especially since Juanito Brown was fired. In this context, on top of not knowing how to build convincing stories, the guy still manages to butcher a piece of work that, in theory, is supposed to be aimed at a heterosexual audience. He insists on creating throwaway chapters that have already proven to be completely ineffective and hollow to the reader. I doubt even the LGBTQIA+ audience is satisfied with this format, yet he still complains about the lack of supporters. He surely must think his target audience is made up of suckers and fools.

An erotic work should be designed to give the reader a convincing fictional experience that triggers a reaction. If the author fails to engage with the target audience, either he knows absolutely nothing about the subject matter or he is trying to act like some avant-garde artist. Frank Romano doesn't create art; what he makes doesn't resonate with the audience, let alone arouse any kind of eroticism in people.

Frankly, if Frank Romano wants to increase his number of supporters, I think some self-criticism would be a good start. He needs to try talking more with the people at the receiving end of production: the audience. He needs to bring actual explicit scenes instead of mere implications, simple and discrete onomatopoeias of an appropriate size, and a more slice-of-life approach regarding the characters. There needs to be continuity in their daily lives to create a more immersive world-building narrative, giving real life to the plot instead of sticking to these throwaway, repetitive, and bland little stories.

You're probably right... however, to his credit, he did try for a short time to establish connections with us and find a common ground for discussion. He also wanted to raise awareness about piracy. Not that he denied its existence, but that we simply needed to find a "modus vivendi," a reasonable timeframe for making our creations public on this forum...

... and some of us mocked him, loudly proclaiming that we were the real pirates and that no rules applied to us, not even a "gentleman's agreement." Without saying anything, I read this exchange without approving of it.

Personally, I regret that FR distanced himself from our little group, and I hope that perhaps, in time, he would have taken some of our suggestions into account. Now, the connection is broken, and I think that's the worst thing that could have happened.

More personnaly....I haven't renewed my subscription for several weeks now, even though I'd been a subscriber for years. I confess, I discovered PK through pirated publications. But I felt it was important to subscribe to support work I hoped would be sustainable... unfortunately (though I'm not a perfect example), I'm losing the motivation to pay for a subscription that only gives me three or four issues of a few series I like every six months. I miss the days when you could buy individual issues (they were $15, if I remember correctly), but I think that could have been a very good economic indicator of their work—what was successful and what wasn't.

Maybe I'm wrong, but switching to a monthly subscription wasn't necessarily a bad idea if it was, as I believed, to increase the number of bestsellers published. Certainly not to create puzzles, chatbots, or other such nonsense. And even less so to create ever more grotesque new series dealing with the exact same themes, without developing the existing ones... the characters, the plots.

I have a passion for villains, zoo and power dynamics or hard domination.

Why do I like LF ? Because I think Cynthia is a great character? Because bestiality and brutality are a game without "damage" in a comic book and that it (finally) gives it energy ? Yes, of course, but especially because today something interesting is being built around old Johnson as an evil and highly perverse character...

Remember, what's interesting about a James Bond film? 007? No, who cares, the actor changes every 10 years and it still works.

What's interesting about James Bond films are the villains. (Their psychologies, their complexities, their traumas and their sadisms, in short, everything that led them to concoct grotesque but fascinating plans to dominate the world)

Johnson is what Bill is with Beatrice Kiddo... we only see him a little, but his evil shadow is ever-present, especially in the later issues... which, of course, are my favorites. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 

Similar threads

2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
42K
Replies
6
Views
25K
Replies
14
Views
75K
36 37 38 39 40
Replies
794
Views
2M
Back
Top Bottom