View attachment 2635762Frank Romano is a professional who doesn't care in the slightest about criticism. No matter how bad his work is, the guy makes absolutely no effort to try and improve its quality. And I’m not even talking about a lack of hardware, because he has plenty of that. It seems like the guy just flipped the "I don't give a fuck" switch and literally couldn't care less about the audience.
Those onomatopoeias filled with doodles and gimmicks that he insists on using simply do not connect with the straight audience. For this demographic, something more explicit and realistic is required: explicit penetration scenes with a comprehensive zoom, plenty of skin texture, photographic effects showing vaginal fluids, and no over-the-top onomatopoeias—just discrete words. The worst part is that, in reality, there are no actual explicit sex scenes; what he delivers are just static images that imply penetration, leaving the visuals looking clunky and artificial.
I bet he must be paying Teddy very well, especially since Juanito Brown was fired. In this context, on top of not knowing how to build convincing stories, the guy still manages to butcher a piece of work that, in theory, is supposed to be aimed at a heterosexual audience. He insists on creating throwaway chapters that have already proven to be completely ineffective and hollow to the reader. I doubt even the LGBTQIA+ audience is satisfied with this format, yet he still complains about the lack of supporters. He surely must think his target audience is made up of suckers and fools.
An erotic work should be designed to give the reader a convincing fictional experience that triggers a reaction. If the author fails to engage with the target audience, either he knows absolutely nothing about the subject matter or he is trying to act like some avant-garde artist. Frank Romano doesn't create art; what he makes doesn't resonate with the audience, let alone arouse any kind of eroticism in people.
Frankly, if Frank Romano wants to increase his number of supporters, I think some self-criticism would be a good start. He needs to try talking more with the people at the receiving end of production: the audience. He needs to bring actual explicit scenes instead of mere implications, simple and discrete onomatopoeias of an appropriate size, and a more slice-of-life approach regarding the characters. There needs to be continuity in their daily lives to create a more immersive world-building narrative, giving real life to the plot instead of sticking to these throwaway, repetitive, and bland little stories.