BlacSmith
New member
Is that Angus with his dick inside Sharona in the photograph? Talk about a major retcon
Is that Angus with his dick inside Sharona in the photograph? Talk about a major retcon
Definitely Angus. Red mo and armpit hair. Who's taking the photo? Some random passer by?Is that Angus with his dick inside Sharona in the photograph? Talk about a major retcon
Oh I see, Angus is supposed to be taking a selfieDefinitely Angus. Red mo and armpit hair. Who's taking the photo? Some random passer by?
Maybe he's off the drugs. Maybe he stopped taking his meds.Seeing the messy writing,I'm pretty sure Jab is now doing drugs
And not the funny ones.
I agree with some of what you're saying, but I have to laugh a bit at your apparent belief that Jab ever cared what his subscribers thought or was ever in touch with planet earth enough to remember what the fuck he'd included in his earlier comics. He made a comment on some forum once that he could never understand artists who put an age statement on their work that said that all characters depicted are over the age of 18. What was the point blah blah blah. Literally every single page on his site has that exact same warning. You're expecting someone who is so unaware of his own work and the site where he makes his living to care that the storylines and characters are consistent? Good luck with thatOk, I was mildly curious as to where this was gonna go. TBH, I hated where Chapter 10 left the story off & was hoping Jab wouldn't continue the series. I won't lie, the fact that he's using flashbacks to go into pedo territory is really turning me off. He was already creeping into it with Wong's sister, but nothing actually happened there since he was focused on people who are definitely older teens/around 18 (unless I missed something) & fully grown adults fucking. I really have no idea why he decided to revive this mess of a series after chapter 10's ending & I have to wonder if he wants no one to want more of it. The mean-spirited writing & continuity that makes no sense at best & is really problematic at worst is also just really bad (& in case anyone asks, yes, those can be turn-offs for me). And reading some of the posts talking about how crazy Jab actually is doesn't help with my opinions on this shit here. It sucks because I liked the earlier chapters (though I think the first could use a redraw & colors), but this shit's gotten really out of hand. My god.

I mean, I can believe that he doesn't actually care about social norms (also, he has to put that warning legally, that's why. Otherwise he could get arrested & put in jail for making what is essentially animated CP).I agree with some of what you're saying, but I have to laugh a bit at your apparent belief that Jab ever cared what his subscribers thought or was ever in touch with planet earth enough to remember what the fuck he'd included in his earlier comics. He made a comment on some forum once that he could never understand artists who put an age statement on their work that said that all characters depicted are over the age of 18. What was the point blah blah blah. Literally every single page on his site has that exact same warning. You're expecting someone who is so unaware of his own work and the site where he makes his living to care that the storylines and characters are consistent? Good luck with thatI've attached exhibit one just to show I don't make this shit up
View attachment 2078519
Like fr, why is bro screaming like that?
I don't think Jab is the one handling the disclaimers. He certainly has a lawyer who oversees the site's legality.I agree with some of what you're saying, but I have to laugh a bit at your apparent belief that Jab ever cared what his subscribers thought or was ever in touch with planet earth enough to remember what the fuck he'd included in his earlier comics. He made a comment on some forum once that he could never understand artists who put an age statement on their work that said that all characters depicted are over the age of 18. What was the point blah blah blah. Literally every single page on his site has that exact same warning. You're expecting someone who is so unaware of his own work and the site where he makes his living to care that the storylines and characters are consistent? Good luck with thatI've attached exhibit one just to show I don't make this shit up
View attachment 2078519
Because she was gonna forgive him if he could resist not fucking her and he failed it.Trish was already teasing Wong! ^^
BTW I didn't understand why Sharona had this issue with him in MHAN 10? And this Yosemite thing? Eventually he made her cum hard and she was the one asking for his cum inside her!Why this stupid "roleplay"? Even I know she is jealous of his relation with Wei!
View attachment 2075826
He might say he does but that doesn't make it true. So what's going to happen if you share the pages and he pings you? Take you to court? In what jurisdiction is a court going to uphold the intellectual copyright of someone who draws comics of underaged characters being involved in graphic sexual acts?I don't think Jab is the one handling the disclaimers. He certainly has a lawyer who oversees the site's legality.
Gee, I thought my OCD was bad....Which part don't you buy? That he doesn't care or that it doesn't matter? We might care but he's demonstrated plenty of times he doesn't care all that much about consistency. Continuity just takes attention to detail and a bit of effort; effort he's repeatedly shown he can't be bothered with otherwise he'd do what you suggest and look back at some of his own comics. Leaving the socks off Eileen's feet in one panel of AP 17 and then putting them back on again in a later panel might trigger my OCD but it's no big deal. But when he just ignores one of the fundamental plot points of a whole series, say ignoring the fact that Angus and Sharona are supposed to never have had sex then no one is going to convince me he gives a fuck. Jab's more interested in seeing himself as some sort of cultural philosopher guru who others come to for pearls of wisdom about movies, animation and culture. Have you ever read some of that shit he comes out with about 'the future of all movies' or 'don't be afraid of AI'? Stay in your lane Jab, talk about stuff you have some understanding of and make sure Eileen's socks are on in all the panels you dingbat!
View attachment 2084392
A minor continuity error in 1 panel is really small potatoes compared to between chapters, don'tcha think? The way the story was going before this chapter, it always seemed that Angus hadn't had sex with anyone but his wife since they got together (I mean, if he was 100% ok with just brazenly cheating on his wife with a literal child, why exactly did he have such a moral conundrum with it in 1 of the earlier chapters when it concerned his older teenage daughter especially when it's clear his wife doesn't love him anymore?) & Sharona, while I don't doubt she's had sex before the start of the series, as young as, what, 10? And with adult men? Bruh. The way you talk about it, keeping the first bit of continuity is the same as making a minor art mistake in a panel that no one would really care about. It literally makes Angus having that moral conundrum mean nothing & shouldn't really be that hard to remember or double check when he literally has the chapters available to him to reread & maintain consistency.Which part don't you buy? That he doesn't care or that it doesn't matter? We might care but he's demonstrated plenty of times he doesn't care all that much about consistency. Continuity just takes attention to detail and a bit of effort; effort he's repeatedly shown he can't be bothered with otherwise he'd do what you suggest and look back at some of his own comics. Leaving the socks off Eileen's feet in one panel of AP 17 and then putting them back on again in a later panel might trigger my OCD but it's no big deal. But when he just ignores one of the fundamental plot points of a whole series, say ignoring the fact that Angus and Sharona are supposed to never have had sex then no one is going to convince me he gives a fuck. Jab's more interested in seeing himself as some sort of cultural philosopher guru who others come to for pearls of wisdom about movies, animation and culture. Have you ever read some of that shit he comes out with about 'the future of all movies' or 'don't be afraid of AI'? Stay in your lane Jab, talk about stuff you have some understanding of and make sure Eileen's socks are on in all the panels you dingbat!
View attachment 2084392
This sort of shit really drives me bonkers but let's face it, it's a porn comic. It does not matter (much)Gee, I thought my OCD was bad....![]()
![]()
The angle it's shown at could indicate that, or it could be intercrural without penetration.Is that Angus with his dick inside Sharona in the photograph? Talk about a major retcon
This is way beside the point, but I'd be willing to bet that the "missing sock" in that top right panel was likely just a coloring issue. He probably meant for there to be socks on both feet because he drew the other sock in the same panel.
I made no defense of him. He doesn't give a fuck and I say so.A minor continuity error in 1 panel is really small potatoes compared to between chapters, don'tcha think? The way the story was going before this chapter, it always seemed that Angus hadn't had sex with anyone but his wife since they got together (I mean, if he was 100% ok with just brazenly cheating on his wife with a literal child, why exactly did he have such a moral conundrum with it in 1 of the earlier chapters when it concerned his older teenage daughter especially when it's clear his wife doesn't love him anymore?) & Sharona, while I don't doubt she's had sex before the start of the series, as young as, what, 10? And with adult men? Bruh. The way you talk about it, keeping the first bit of continuity is the same as making a minor art mistake in a panel that no one would really care about. It literally makes Angus having that moral conundrum mean nothing & shouldn't really be that hard to remember or double check when he literally has the chapters available to him to reread & maintain consistency.
This is a false equivalency & completely devalues your argument of making dumb & flimsy excuses for him. The better thing to have said was, "This guy's insane. He doesn't really give a fuck about continuity or consistency. It sucks, but that's just how he is" rather than make a bad defense for him. Hell, you had most of that in your previous replies, but decided to try to excuse Jab's stupidity rather than just keep it short & simple.