You know, I've come to expect and accept a lot of wild takes on a topic here, and I usually roll with it. But I really feel I need to disagree with the very notion of praising the commercialization of Hollywood.
The stuff above looks to me to describe the exact process by which producers and studio executives frequently cheapen, degrade, and dilute the work of the writer, director, and other creative artists involved in the production of the film, right down to the lighting director and the choreographer. In other words, how artists in that industry famously suffer by being pushed by bean counters and suits to change their art to suit the whims of the paying public.
I could expand on this, but I think there may have been a few thousand books, movies, TV shows, and trade articles on that subject that do it a lot better than I can. If we're talking movies, you might start with THE PLAYER or SUNSET BOULEVARD. It doesn't seem, at least to me, to be to be a practice worthy of lauding or replicating.
Or, as one of the greatest creative artists of the last century, Alan Moore, said:
It's not the job of the artist to give the audience what the audience wants. If the audience knew what they needed, then they wouldn't be the audience. They would be the artists. It is the job of artists to give the audience what they need.
Plus, we are dealing with Kizaru, who is only good at starting comics, has no earthly idea what to do with them after that, and never even bothers to finish them. They are an artist who has never produced a hint of denouement.
Kizaru doesn't need audience feedback. Kizaru needs to learn basic plotting and three act structure.
