[MandoLogica] Breaking Boundaries

[mickeymc]

You're SS subscriber!? huh Strange but I thought you're country doesn't allow to you subscribe to your favorite artists. I mean thats what you have told us right.

Yeah, that's true, but I found a way to subscribe now.

 

[AnonWebster12]

I am no subscriber. But I consider you your posts as a PAID ADVERTISEMENT. I write because people have to understand who you are. That's it.

Just for the clarification by "you" here you meant mickeymc Right!? Cuz I don't even remember advertising for any artist .
I was just busting his bubbles.

 

[AnonWebster12]

Yeah, that's true, but I found a way to subscribe now.

Sure man we believe you ishh . Or maybe you were a subscriber all the time. Not that it matters to any of us.
You just keep doing what you do man.

 

[Urikf]

Just for the clarification by "you" here you meant mickeymc Right!? Cuz I don't even remember advertising for any artist .
I was just busting his bubbles.

Just for clarification

There are two categories of people
1. Subscribers
2. People who don't want to pay for subscription (we don't discuss why they don't want to pay).

Some subscribers post some of their collection for free. It is up them.

Taking into account all of above mentioned how would you react if the same person at least once a week agitate for some author(s). I doubt if he will do it because he(she) really wants to help author FOR FREE or it is an act of GOOD WILL. The first thing that comes to your mind that somebody ASKED him(her) to do it. The author asked somebody to agitate to generate new subscribers because it would be ridiculous if author would beg money for himself.

I agree to support any person if he is disabled, victim of violence, required an expensive surgery and so on.

Now let's discuss about authors of porno comics. These people are MOONLIGHTING. It is a SECOND INCOME for them. It is possibly that they keep secret about their identity just because they signed a contract with their employer that they will be a subject of dismissal as a result of violation of contract because moonlighting is prohibited. The similar clauses are typical in the modern job market. Therefore I believe that asking TO SUPPORT A PERSON WHO IS MOONLIGHTING IS AT LEAST NON-ETHICAL. I believe I explained you how to respond to such comments. Therefore, I consider comments of users like mickymc legal but non-ethical. It is OK when the author posts some of his artworks as a promotion but if the third-party person agitate to pay to any author is an advertisement. If you disagree with my arguments you are free to ask this question to lawyer who specialized on advertisement law. I don't like a holy wars at non-political forums. I just prefer to clarify my point of view. OK?

​

 

[AnonWebster12]

Just for clarification

There are two categories of people
1. Subscribers
2. People who don't want to pay for subscription (we don't discuss why they don't want to pay).

Some subscribers post some of their collection for free. It is up them.

Taking into account all of above mentioned how would you react if the same person at least once a week agitate for some author(s). I doubt if he will do it because he(she) really wants to help author FOR FREE or it is an act of GOOD WILL. The first thing that comes to your mind that somebody ASKED him(her) to do it. The author asked somebody to agitate to generate new subscribers because it would be ridiculous if author would beg money for himself.

I agree to support any person if he is disabled, victim of violence, required an expensive surgery and so on.

Now let's discuss about authors of porno comics. These people are MOONLIGHTING. It is a SECOND INCOME for them. It is possibly that they keep secret about their identity just because they signed a contract with their employer that they will be a subject of dismissal as a result of violation of contract because moonlighting is prohibited. The similar clauses are typical in the modern job market. Therefore I believe that asking TO SUPPORT A PERSON WHO IS MOONLIGHTING IS AT LEAST NON-ETHICAL. I believe I explained you how to respond to such comments. Therefore, I consider comments of users like mickymc legal but non-ethical. It is OK when the author posts some of his artworks as a promotion but if the third-party person agitate to pay to any author is an advertisement. If you disagree with my arguments you are free to ask this question to lawyer who specialized on advertisement law. I don't like a holy wars at non-political forums. I just prefer to clarify my point of view. OK?

​

Wow dude Do you really use that much of your head on such easy & trivial matters and at the same time doesn't have a slightest bit of clue about the context of my comment.
I just asked you clarify the person hence "you" in your post. Is it me or mickeymc guy Cuz you replied to me and accused my previous post as paid advertisement, which clearly doesn't make any sense
Just for the record are you using some kind of translator or something, cuz it's not working well hence the misunderstanding maybe.

 

[Urikf]

Wow dude Do you really use that much of your head on such easy & trivial matters and at the same time doesn't have a slightest bit of clue about the context of my comment.
I just asked you clarify the person hence "you" in your post. Is it me or mickeymc guy Cuz you replied to me and accused my previous post as paid advertisement, which clearly doesn't make any sense
Just for the record are you using some kind of translator or something, cuz it's not working well hence the misunderstanding maybe.

I DON'T PROVE that somebody paid to you or anybody because is a defamation or libel (I don't have a copy of transactions or copies of emails, private messages and so on). I just say that it SOUNDS LIKE advertisement from the point of view of independent person. I believe I clarified my statements?

"If it quacks like a duck, if it flies like a duck, if it swims like a duck, then it probably is a duck."

 

[justanothernoob]

BB 9 - Slightly better quality than what's been posted so far, images 1 - 34, 1001 x 563, 6.93MB

 

[Kai77]

There is a German-born Turkish actress who I think resembles the character of Adrianna. She is also 41 years old and a MILF... She played a mature woman in a TV series called “RU” and the plot of “RU” is, “The love between a 38-year-old woman whose marriage is going wrong and a 18-year-old young man...'

So, here is Meryem Uzerli, who I liken to Adrianna.

https://www.instagram.com/meryemuzerlimeryem/?hl=en

Does it have sex in it

 

[Kai77]

Yes

Ok thanks

 

[Kai77]

Does it have sex in it

Do you have a link to watch it for free

 

[motfan]

BB 09 - By third party website

 

[xnzvieruxs]

There is a German-born Turkish actress who I think resembles the character of Adrianna. She is also 41 years old and a MILF... She played a mature woman in a TV series called “RU” and the plot of “RU” is, “The love between a 38-year-old woman whose marriage is going wrong and a 18-year-old young man...'

So, here is Meryem Uzerli, who I liken to Adrianna.

https://www.instagram.com/meryemuzerlimeryem/?hl=en

If Adrianna exist in real life, she would be Mistress T. She's the closest resemblance to her imo.

 

[Johnsina21]

HOT

 

[motfan]

BB 09 - By third party website

 

[motfan]

BB 09 - By third party website

 

[Johnsina21]

PREVIEW

 

[pinheiroleo33]

This comic changed so much from its original proposal... I dont even understand the story anymore.

 

[motfan]

BB 09 - By third party website

 

[tolok78]

it looks like a completely different story...

 

[Deleted member 2170]

it looks like a completely different story...

I thought so, too. I don't think it's in the style of Mandologica's comics, but I wouldn't be surprised to see (or would like to see) Lucas feminization or femdom by his mother