[Pegasus Smith] Au Naturel

[Deleted member 2401]

Even if they ban me from f95 "my" update image of AN18 is reposted there.
ΑΝ18 reached 70 pages and there is no fuck scene, is it the reaction of PS to the leaks?

You realize that you are not the only one with access to PS page right? SexPornComics is notorious for leaking the pages and i just checked, it has their logo on it again. And the post only has up to page 60 and then a 12 MB PNG that says go to SexPornComic to read the rest.

So i highly doubt these are "your" pages

Also not sure how you got to the conclusion that F95 banned you for doing exactly what the site is there for... Leaking comics and games...

 

[Nexoby]

Au Naturel new page

I got the link from f95, thank you to those who shared it

Mega

 

[Hasik]

From F95 - AN 18 : 56-60

 

[Nexoby]

From F95 - AN 18 : 56-60

Are the other pages on the site called sexporncomic.com?

 

[Nexoby]

56-70
thank you sexporncomic.com
please don't forget support artist

 

[zdglee]

I really hope people don't support that dick from sexporncomics

View attachment 70787View attachment 70788View attachment 70789View attachment 70790View attachment 70791View attachment 70792View attachment 70793View attachment 70794View attachment 70795View attachment 70796View attachment 70797View attachment 70798View attachment 70799View attachment 70800View attachment 70801View attachment 70802View attachment 70803View attachment 70804View attachment 70805View attachment 70806View attachment 70807View attachment 70809View attachment 70810View attachment 70811View attachment 70812View attachment 70813View attachment 70814View attachment 70816View attachment 70817View attachment 70818View attachment 70819View attachment 70821View attachment 70822View attachment 70823View attachment 70824View attachment 70825View attachment 70826View attachment 70827View attachment 70828View attachment 70830View attachment 70831View attachment 70832View attachment 70833View attachment 70834View attachment 70835View attachment 70836View attachment 70838View attachment 70839View attachment 70840View attachment 70841View attachment 70842View attachment 70843View attachment 70844View attachment 70845View attachment 70846View attachment 70847

Hi bro! Thank you for posting. And I have a question, there are watermarks in dim and large numbers on No. 46, 50, 51, and 53. Did you know? Other pages are fine, but for what reason are only 4 pages watermarks?

 

[dykan29]

Hi bro! Thank you for posting. And I have a question, there are watermarks in dim and large numbers on No. 46, 50, 51, and 53. Did you know? Other pages are fine, but for what reason are only 4 pages watermarks?

that means this account is banned my dear.............

 

[dykan29]

I did this very quick edit and <work> on these images to eliminate the logo <sexporncomic.com> until someone post clear.....
I am sure will reposted in f95....

 

[Nexoby]

I did this very quick edit and <work> on these images to eliminate the logo until someone post clear.....
I am sure will reposted in f95....
View attachment 107848

May I know what you fixed here? I couldn't see any difference, it just seems like there are numbers somewhere in the middle.

 

[dykan29]

May I know what you fixed here? I couldn't see any difference, it just seems like there are numbers somewhere in the middle.

for a moment I thought you are serious my friend when you say no difference, but I didn't want to edit more the images because belong to banned account .............

 

[Nexoby]

I really don't understand, there is a small sexporncomic logo above, but yours seems to have big invisible numbers.

for a moment I thought you are serious my friend when you say no difference, but I didn't want to edit more the images because belong to banned account .............

I really don't understand, there is a small sexporncomic logo above, but yours seems to have big invisible numbers.

 

[dykan29]

I really don't understand, there is a small sexporncomic logo above, but yours seems to have big invisible numbers.

I really don't understand, there is a small sexporncomic logo above, but yours seems to have big invisible numbers.

ok I see you are not joking and you see in my zip logo of <sexporncomic > ?
my image

leaked image

(( later edit)) the statistics said most users are using smartphone so I just guess dear <nexoboy> was easy to compare the two images....

 

[MrSpock]

Same pictures from sexporncomics in 4K (jpg 95% compressed) without the logos. Some pages have watermarks identifying the subscriber. I removed most of these watermarks. I think the result was satisfactory.

 

[mickeymc]

Same pictures from sexporncomics in 4K (jpg 95% compressed) without the logos. Some pages have watermarks identifying the subscriber. I removed most of these watermarks. I think the result was satisfactory.

View attachment 108455View attachment 108456View attachment 108457View attachment 108458View attachment 108459View attachment 108460View attachment 108461View attachment 108462View attachment 108463View attachment 108464View attachment 108465View attachment 108466View attachment 108467View attachment 108468View attachment 108469View attachment 108469

Thank you very much @MrSpock !

 

[dykan29]

Same pictures from sexporncomics in 4K (jpg 95% compressed) without the logos. Some pages have watermarks identifying the subscriber. I removed most of these watermarks. I think the result was satisfactory.

View attachment 108455View attachment 108456View attachment 108457View attachment 108458View attachment 108459View attachment 108460View attachment 108461View attachment 108462View attachment 108463View attachment 108464View attachment 108465View attachment 108466View attachment 108467View attachment 108468View attachment 108469View attachment 108469

my dear <mr spock> the quality is 72% I include in two pdf the result. Also I see you use the gimp 2.1 for your edit...........

 

[MrSpock]

my dear <mr spock> the images you post are having the worst edit. I just point one of them I don't know you edit or someone else but also the quality is 72% I include in two pdf the result. Also I see you use the gimp 2.1 for your edit there are much better software for such job..........View attachment 110454

I try to do my best. Thank you for your opinion. I'm a linux user and GIMP 2.10 is the best option I have. If you know other linux software that are best then GIMP 2.10, please, inform me.

 

[dykan29]

I try to do my best. Thank you for your opinion. I'm a linux user and GIMP 2.10 is the best option I have. If you know other linux software that are best then GIMP 2.10, please, inform me.

I saw you are using linux I try long time ago the ubuntu 12.4 I think it was, the problem of linux is the support so I quit that's why I have nothing to suggest also gimp has a lot of utilities but for this job photoshop is way better. I did my edit just to eliminate their logo and knowing someone will post the clear images 56-70. This is the reason I stretch only above the image and not doing more because they belong to banned account.....

 

[Zed]

my dear <mr spock> the quality is 72% I include in two pdf the result. Also I see you use the gimp 2.1 for your edit...........

You are confusing jpeg compression quality with the ppi (meaningless here). MrSpock's files have indeed the compression quality set to 95.
BTW, GIMP is fine, more than enough for such simple edits. As they say, a bad workman always blames his tools.

 

[Exo]

Please keep the discussion on-topic(about the content) and civil.

 

[dykan29]

Please keep the discussion on-topic(about the content) and civil.

I like such talks for technical matters but sure are not belong here I wish someone create something for that matters... If there is please point me there....