PigKing publishes 10 free preview images for each episode of its stories.
He sells the full episode for money on his website. This is how he earns his living.
It’s high time to understand that he will not publish PDF files for free and deprive his team of income.
Stop throwing tantrums in this forum thread.
True fans of PigKing's work buy a subscription on the official website and, after a certain time, share his works.
An example of a true fan for me is revolverocl2, who shared pictures on the old forum after 2-3 months of publication on the official website.
I want to add here the motto of fans of Daval3D's creativity and change it a little for this topic.
Please support Pigking/CrazyDad!
I agree that PigKing is not obligated to publish anything for free. I also agree that after a period of 2 to 3 months, it's perfectly acceptable for us to publish something. Furthermore, there is nothingillegal about sharing a product for free that I purchased with my own money. Once I acquire a publication by paying for it, it becomes my property, and if I choose to share that publication on the internet, it's my prerogative.Accusing people of piracy because we are freely sharing something that belongs to us seems like stretching the argument too far.
The market operates cyclically, with periods of expansion and contraction being normal. What's happening here is essentially free advertising for their products. We publish because we support them andwant them to consistently sell and continue their work. They need to define their work aimed at their majority audience and develop a more focused approach toward them. They don't want anything to be published and wantauthority over publications acquired through payment. If we were selling these, then they could accuse us of piracy. The internet is free and will remain so.
When considering the issue of freely sharing PigKing's content, several key arguments come into play.
Firstly, there's the aspect of promotion. By sharing content we've purchased, we effectively promote PigKing's products to a wider audience. This form of word-of-mouth marketing can lead to increasedvisibility and potentially more sales.
Secondly, there's the matter of consumer rights. When we buy a product, we also acquire certain rights to use and share it within reasonable bounds. Restricting our ability to share legally acquired contentcould be seen as limiting consumer rights.
Moreover, many of us share PigKing's content freely out of a sense of community support and goodwill. This grassroots support can be invaluable for small businesses, helping them thrive in a competitivemarket.
Additionally, in today's digital age, companies like PigKing must adapt to the changing landscape of publishing. Embracing free sharing as a form of promotion can be a strategic move in this regard.
Lastly, fostering a culture of creativity and innovation is essential. Allowing open sharing of content can lead to new ideas and creations, benefiting everyone involved. By embracing this culture, PigKingcan position itself as forward-thinking and innovative.
In conclusion, while concerns about piracy are valid, PigKing should consider the potential benefits of allowing more open sharing of their content within reasonable bounds. This could lead to a strongerrelationship with their audience and increased success in the long term.