• Staff Applications are OPEN! [ Staff / Moderator ] More Info HERE Help us make a better forum for everyone!

[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics

Now it's time for Brandie's daughter to experience the power of the horny dog with impressive stamina. Will she be able to handle it? Will there be a sexual rally spanning three chapters or more? Maybe Brandie herself will show up in the second stage to spice things up even further!

Why must every character fuck a dog??? Can't we have 1 goddamn series without bestiality? It's too late for this series but more and more there are no series without bestiality or futa.

It's probably time for me to move on from CD/PK i guess since people who want JUST incest are not valued customers. Yes valued customers because unlike the majority of users here, i have paid for multiple subscriptions before Patreon and with Patreon

1743013093929.png
 
Why must every character fuck a dog??? Can't we have 1 goddamn series without bestiality? It's too late for this series but more and more there are no series without bestiality or futa.

It's probably time for me to move on from CD/PK i guess since people who want JUST incest are not valued customers. Yes valued customers because unlike the majority of users here, i have paid for multiple subscriptions before Patreon and with Patreon

View attachment 1433082
If you don't like it, simply don't consume it and don't feel the need to comment. No one is obligated to watch or buy anything, and those who enjoy it will continue investing in what they like. If the topic bestilality doesn't interest you, look for other content that suits you. Everyone has the right to consume what they want, without judgment or restrictions. And take careful whit your Masturbation. You are a porn addict who wants to appear sensible and balanced, but you are not! Try watching a movie on Xvideos, there are good, beautiful porn actresses and don't come and bother people!
 
Last edited:
Why must every character fuck a dog??? Can't we have 1 goddamn series without bestiality? It's too late for this series but more and more there are no series without bestiality or futa.

It's probably time for me to move on from CD/PK i guess since people who want JUST incest are not valued customers. Yes valued customers because unlike the majority of users here, i have paid for multiple subscriptions before Patreon and with Patreon

View attachment 1433082
you had to participate in the survey... "vox populi, vox dei", 🤣🤣🤣 (jokes aside there are many series without zoo, It's a question of publication schedule)
 
you had to participate in the survey... "vox populi, vox dei", 🤣🤣🤣 (jokes aside there are many series without zoo, It's a question of publication schedule)
He doesn't like it and doesn't want anyone to see it, the stories are funny and most people like them. No, the character had sex with a dog, he condemns the whole work. I think he has mental problems. The funniest part of PigKing is precisely the bestiality stories. It has become a PigKing trademark. Every now and then someone appears wanting to prohibit bestiality. If it were something real, I would understand, but it's a 3D drawing and then goes through AI for texturing. The guy is crazy!
 
Why must every character fuck a dog??? Can't we have 1 goddamn series without bestiality? It's too late for this series but more and more there are no series without bestiality or futa.

It's probably time for me to move on from CD/PK i guess since people who want JUST incest are not valued customers. Yes valued customers because unlike the majority of users here, i have paid for multiple subscriptions before Patreon and with Patreon

View attachment 1433082
Saying it this way sounds like you're trying to impose your view. But on a strictly moral issue, in what your preference is better? That's the question! 🤔
 
Why must every character fuck a dog??? Can't we have 1 goddamn series without bestiality? It's too late for this series but more and more there are no series without bestiality or futa.

It's probably time for me to move on from CD/PK i guess since people who want JUST incest are not valued customers. Yes valued customers because unlike the majority of users here, i have paid for multiple subscriptions before Patreon and with Patreon

View attachment 1433082
Not all PigKing/CrazyDad3D titles have scenes of bestiality. Madison, Miranda, Preacher's Wife, Father's Love and the Hell Village titles have also SO FAR not featured scenes with dogs and/or horses.But I would REALLY like to see hotties like Madison and Miranda hooking up with a dog. I almost don't like seeing bestiality with skinny women, as is the case with ExtremeXWorld.
 
Last edited:
Not all PigKing/CrazyDad3D titles have scenes of bestiality. Madison, Miranda, Preacher's Wife, Father's Love and the Hell Village titles have also SO FAR not featured scenes with dogs and/or horses.
It's scary to me how a person can fall in love with a 3D character created by a rendering program!
 
Not all PigKing/CrazyDad3D titles have scenes of bestiality. Madison, Miranda, Preacher's Wife, Father's Love and the Hell Village titles have also SO FAR not featured scenes with dogs and/or horses.But I would REALLY like to see hotties like Madison and Miranda hooking up with a dog. I almost don't like seeing bestiality with skinny women, as is the case with ExtremeXWorld.

I said bestiality or futa (Shemale).

So that leaves 3 series.

CrazyDad/PigKing has 130+ series.
 
The Zoophilia in PigKing's stories stands out as one of the most original and striking approaches within the work’s universe, especially because the author does not limit himself to the conventions of traditional morality and focuses on characters who, by their very nature, are profoundly unconventional. PigKing creates a world where the characters are not typical human beings, but rather complex and multifaceted creatures who live outside the normative standards of society, providing a rare creative freedom in literature.

When addressing themes like the Zoophilia, the author is able to not only explore the dynamics of unconventional relationships but also do so in an intelligent and sensitive way, establishing an emotional connection between the characters that transcends what one might expect from stories involving love and affection. This approach makes it so that, despite the amoral and immoral setting of the narrative, the audience can still relate to and, in some way, be moved by the dilemmas and bonds presented. What’s most impressive is that PigKing, unlike many other authors who limit themselves to exploring these themes in a superficial or shallow way, invests in an emotional construction that borders on love without boundaries, challenging conventions and stimulating reflection on the nature of human feelings.

This originality in treating the theme is one of the trademarks of the work, something that distinguishes it from other texts that attempt to address similar topics in a predictable or moralistic manner. However, the true strength of PigKing lies in his ability to challenge established moral norms. Many authors, when writing about themes like the Zoophilia, feel pressured to impose some form of conventional morality, which often results in a shallow or stigmatizing narrative. In PigKing's case, however, the approach is quite the opposite: he creates a space where the characters can exist without the constraints of limited moral judgment, while also offering the reader a deeper experience of reflection on the realities of these relationships.

Regarding false morality, PigKing stands against the imposition of external norms on others' choices and feelings. In the world we live in, morality is often used as a tool of control, where society expects everyone to conform to a behavior standard that, in many cases, does not reflect the reality or complexity of human experiences. The author seems to question this idea, suggesting that morality should not be a straightjacket, but something to be understood in a more fluid and individual way, allowing for a more genuine understanding of human relationships without the hypocrisies that often permeate external analyses.

By addressing themes with such freedom, PigKing challenges the reader to reflect on how much society imposes behavior standards that don’t necessarily reflect what’s healthiest or fairest for the individuals involved. Rather than trying to please moralists or conform to popular expectations, the author does something bolder and more relevant: he questions the very foundation of a moralism that, too often, is merely a façade for maintaining a status quo that doesn’t allow for true freedom of being.

Ultimately, PigKing reminds us that by seeking to impose rigid moralism on a universe of characters so far removed from normativity, we miss the opportunity to appreciate the richness of the multiple forms of relationships that exist outside the conventional. The true critique, perhaps, is precisely that many times people cling to false morality as a way of avoiding confronting the complexities and nuances of what is truly human.

Furthermore, when we are talking about 3D characters, which are artistic and fictional creations, it is not permissible to establish rigid behavioral rules or regulations about what can or cannot be done, limiting the creativity of authors. This imposition of limits is often driven by personal interests of emotionally unresolved individuals who try to project their own frustrations and concepts of morality onto universes that should be free and open to creative exploration. Artistic creations, in any form they take, should be a space where imagination is free to explore, question, and challenge, without the burden of external judgments that merely aim to restrict freedom of expression.
 
I'm not like that, the people who fall in love and even MARRY comic book characters (erotic or not) are the Japanese (not all, not even the majority, I believe).
I wasn't referring to you, I'm sorry if I expressed myself badly! I was just reinforcing the idea that there should be a separation between fiction and reality and some people get upset if their favorite character does something that goes against their concept of normativity.
 
He doesn't like it and doesn't want anyone to see it, the stories are funny and most people like them. No, the character had sex with a dog, he condemns the whole work. I think he has mental problems. The funniest part of PigKing is precisely the bestiality stories. It has become a PigKing trademark. Every now and then someone appears wanting to prohibit bestiality. If it were something real, I would understand, but it's a 3D drawing and then goes through AI for texturing. The guy is crazy!
And that's what's fun, because it's unrealistic. It's precisely because it's a work of pure fiction that it's fun.
 
The Zoophilia in PigKing's stories stands out as one of the most original and striking approaches within the work’s universe, especially because the author does not limit himself to the conventions of traditional morality and focuses on characters who, by their very nature, are profoundly unconventional. PigKing creates a world where the characters are not typical human beings, but rather complex and multifaceted creatures who live outside the normative standards of society, providing a rare creative freedom in literature.

When addressing themes like the Zoophilia, the author is able to not only explore the dynamics of unconventional relationships but also do so in an intelligent and sensitive way, establishing an emotional connection between the characters that transcends what one might expect from stories involving love and affection. This approach makes it so that, despite the amoral and immoral setting of the narrative, the audience can still relate to and, in some way, be moved by the dilemmas and bonds presented. What’s most impressive is that PigKing, unlike many other authors who limit themselves to exploring these themes in a superficial or shallow way, invests in an emotional construction that borders on love without boundaries, challenging conventions and stimulating reflection on the nature of human feelings.

This originality in treating the theme is one of the trademarks of the work, something that distinguishes it from other texts that attempt to address similar topics in a predictable or moralistic manner. However, the true strength of PigKing lies in his ability to challenge established moral norms. Many authors, when writing about themes like the Zoophilia, feel pressured to impose some form of conventional morality, which often results in a shallow or stigmatizing narrative. In PigKing's case, however, the approach is quite the opposite: he creates a space where the characters can exist without the constraints of limited moral judgment, while also offering the reader a deeper experience of reflection on the realities of these relationships.

Regarding false morality, PigKing stands against the imposition of external norms on others' choices and feelings. In the world we live in, morality is often used as a tool of control, where society expects everyone to conform to a behavior standard that, in many cases, does not reflect the reality or complexity of human experiences. The author seems to question this idea, suggesting that morality should not be a straightjacket, but something to be understood in a more fluid and individual way, allowing for a more genuine understanding of human relationships without the hypocrisies that often permeate external analyses.

By addressing themes with such freedom, PigKing challenges the reader to reflect on how much society imposes behavior standards that don’t necessarily reflect what’s healthiest or fairest for the individuals involved. Rather than trying to please moralists or conform to popular expectations, the author does something bolder and more relevant: he questions the very foundation of a moralism that, too often, is merely a façade for maintaining a status quo that doesn’t allow for true freedom of being.

Ultimately, PigKing reminds us that by seeking to impose rigid moralism on a universe of characters so far removed from normativity, we miss the opportunity to appreciate the richness of the multiple forms of relationships that exist outside the conventional. The true critique, perhaps, is precisely that many times people cling to false morality as a way of avoiding confronting the complexities and nuances of what is truly human.

Furthermore, when we are talking about 3D characters, which are artistic and fictional creations, it is not permissible to establish rigid behavioral rules or regulations about what can or cannot be done, limiting the creativity of authors. This imposition of limits is often driven by personal interests of emotionally unresolved individuals who try to project their own frustrations and concepts of morality onto universes that should be free and open to creative exploration. Artistic creations, in any form they take, should be a space where imagination is free to explore, question, and challenge, without the burden of external judgments that merely aim to restrict freedom of expression.
impressive 😳😳
 

Similar threads

2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
42K
Replies
6
Views
25K
Replies
14
Views
75K
37 38 39 40 41
Replies
801
Views
2M
Back
Top Bottom