I, for example, like to use AI to reinterpret the works of renowned artists like Pig King, for example. Even so, I prefer to keep the original style without making changes. The work done in 3D programs will not be surpassed anytime soon, as AI still doesn't have a program geared towards this type of content. The ones that do exist are very weak and always create characters with an anime-like style, and they can't maintain the symmetry of the drawing by matching the images. That said, when AIs first appeared, I found them interesting because of the technological novelty. But later, my enthusiasm cooled down considerably because of AI's deficiencies. It might become viable in a more distant future, but it can't replace programs specifically designed for this type of content.
I use AI mainly to improve the texture of images while trying to preserve the artist's work, and of course, giving them full credit. I, for example, think that Pig King needs to revisit their compositions because they become very monotonous to read and see, which is why I do things that I consider would be interesting. However, Pig King is a standout in this type of content. I hope they review their work philosophy. Regardless of whether their work is in line with their previous best efforts, I still enjoy reading the stories a lot.
If you don't like what's being done, present something different for comparison—that's what I think. Besides, I have fun redoing some stories that I consider very good, and I enjoy producing them. My criticisms regarding Pig King will always be constructive.
View attachment 767287
