• Staff Applications are OPEN! [ Staff / Moderator ] More Info HERE Help us make a better forum for everyone!

[PigKing/CrazyDad] Discussion / Controversies and Fan Service.

We continue with the ode to this majestic queen, owner of a beauty so unreal that it should be illegal. 😳🧐 With a commercial smile and a body sculpted by the gods themselves, she had it all... except entertainment.👩‍⚖️🙄🎭 Poor creature! 🥺Her lack of interest in ordinary life forced her to cultivate a double identity, becoming the most fabulous nonconformist in history, because a single life simply wasn't enough to contain so much audacity and sophistication in one person, named 💕Claire✨.🫢😍❤️😂
1772206615342.jpeg
 
No way, that’s completely unrealistic.

Not much more than an adult moose or a mountain gorilla ;);););)

From the beginning, LF has positioned itself as a fantasy fiction where boundaries have long since been pushed... until the arrival of Santa Claus :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: , so yes, why not continue ?

(And then, dog, horse, horse, dog, and then dog and horse again—it gets tiresome after a while. A little bit of exoticism and change of pace is needed; Cynthia's world is one of the few that lends itself perfectly to this. 😁 )
 
Last edited:
I even think it could be fun, but the problem is that the plot is already starting to show clear signs of exhaustion. Soon they will put a dinosaur on the island. Then a python, an anaconda, and at that point what still had a minimum of plausibility turns into caricatured fiction.
For me, the strength of the story has always been precisely in the feeling that it could happen within certain limits. It does not need to be a documentary, but it needs to respect a coherent internal logic. When a narrative is anchored in a minimally feasible reality, the reader can truly engage, because there is tension, consequence, and verisimilitude. Immersion depends on that.
When exaggerations start piling up just to shock or surprise, the story loses dramatic weight. If everything is possible at any moment, then nothing has real impact. Suspension of disbelief only works when the author establishes clear rules and maintains consistency. Without that, it almost becomes an unintentional parody.
I really did not like the whole gorillas and chimpanzees angle very much. For me, that was the point where the exaggeration crossed the line of what still felt coherent within the original premise. It is not a moral issue, it is structural. It leaves the realm of something that could happen within that universe and enters the territory of gratuitous absurdity.
In the case of Tomb Rider and Queen Azalea, the proposal is different from the beginning. Those works were born entirely in the realm of fantasy and openly fictional storytelling. Their universes do not attempt to rely on a realistic foundation; from the very first moment they establish that extraordinary rules are part of that world. When fantasy is clear and openly assumed, the audience enters already knowing they will see improbable creatures and impossible situations. It works because there is internal coherence within that fantastical logic.
The problem is not fantasy itself. The problem is when a story begins grounded in something plausible and, halfway through, abandons that foundation without properly preparing the ground. If the proposal is fully fictional, then let it be so from the start. But if the idea is to maintain an atmosphere closer to reality, then that line needs to be respected in order to preserve immersion.
The author can do whatever he wants, of course. I simply defend that when a work is born with its feet in reality, it becomes much stronger by maintaining that coherence until the end.
 
I even think it could be fun, but the problem is that the plot is already starting to show clear signs of exhaustion. Soon they will put a dinosaur on the island. Then a python, an anaconda, and at that point what still had a minimum of plausibility turns into caricatured fiction.
For me, the strength of the story has always been precisely in the feeling that it could happen within certain limits. It does not need to be a documentary, but it needs to respect a coherent internal logic. When a narrative is anchored in a minimally feasible reality, the reader can truly engage, because there is tension, consequence, and verisimilitude. Immersion depends on that.
When exaggerations start piling up just to shock or surprise, the story loses dramatic weight. If everything is possible at any moment, then nothing has real impact. Suspension of disbelief only works when the author establishes clear rules and maintains consistency. Without that, it almost becomes an unintentional parody.
I really did not like the whole gorillas and chimpanzees angle very much. For me, that was the point where the exaggeration crossed the line of what still felt coherent within the original premise. It is not a moral issue, it is structural. It leaves the realm of something that could happen within that universe and enters the territory of gratuitous absurdity.
In the case of Tomb Rider and Queen Azalea, the proposal is different from the beginning. Those works were born entirely in the realm of fantasy and openly fictional storytelling. Their universes do not attempt to rely on a realistic foundation; from the very first moment they establish that extraordinary rules are part of that world. When fantasy is clear and openly assumed, the audience enters already knowing they will see improbable creatures and impossible situations. It works because there is internal coherence within that fantastical logic.
The problem is not fantasy itself. The problem is when a story begins grounded in something plausible and, halfway through, abandons that foundation without properly preparing the ground. If the proposal is fully fictional, then let it be so from the start. But if the idea is to maintain an atmosphere closer to reality, then that line needs to be respected in order to preserve immersion.
The author can do whatever he wants, of course. I simply defend that when a work is born with its feet in reality, it becomes much stronger by maintaining that coherence until the end.

Yet the Gorilla appeared as early as episode 4 of the LF series... so this narrative has continued from the beginning.

Personally, aside from the giant werewolf dream, which I found grotesque, I love everything about this series, the fact that boundaries are constantly being pushed. This is precisely what keeps the series fresh. Until the arrival of the two brothers, which I wasn't expecting, and which revealed Cynthia's new nature.

In short, I haven't given up hope that one day you and I will agree. 😅 😅 😅
 
Calm down, everyone. It's just a joke! It's not a test to see the public's reaction or anything like that. The stories will continue as normal.
 
Not much more than an adult moose or a mountain gorilla ;);););)

From the beginning, LF has positioned itself as a fantasy fiction where boundaries have long since been pushed... until the arrival of Santa Claus :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: , so yes, why not continue ?

(And then, dog, horse, horse, dog, and then dog and horse again—it gets tiresome after a while. A little bit of exoticism and change of pace is needed; Cynthia's world is one of the few that lends itself perfectly to this. 😁 )
Lost Family was not anchored in fantastic realism. If the sexual act itself tires the reader, then any story centered only on sex between human beings would also become tiring. When the proposal becomes merely to satisfy curiosity about how many different animals Cinthya can have sexual relations with, the internal coherence of the work is lost and, with that, Lost Family loses its meaning.
I understand that you like it. I will not question the author’s creative freedom, the work belongs to him. However, I do not agree with the hypothesis that it is fantastic realism. The stories involving gorillas remained more in the realm of parody, and I interpreted them as such, as humor. The relationship with dogs and horses, on the other hand, is based on something that refers to reality, which completely changes the weight of the narrative.
If the intention is merely to render scenes of a penis penetrating a pussy repeatedly, then there is no need to create dialogue or attempt to give the work a broader meaning. What is missing, in my opinion, is a true slice of life element. The characters seem to exist exclusively to have sex. There is no routine, no daily life, no world building.
Cinthya does not cook, does not drink water, does not sleep, does not use a computer, does not get in touch with her father or with Darla. Nothing happens beyond the sexual scenes. The narrative is reduced to showing a penis and a pussy in continuous action without emotional or contextual development.
If the proposal is only to display genitals, then at least there should be a more consistent technical update, with plugins that make the genital organs more realistic. But if there is an intention to build a story, what is lacking is depth, context, and humanity in the characters.
 
Yet the Gorilla appeared as early as episode 4 of the LF series... so this narrative has continued from the beginning.

Personally, aside from the giant werewolf dream, which I found grotesque, I love everything about this series, the fact that boundaries are constantly being pushed. This is precisely what keeps the series fresh. Until the arrival of the two brothers, which I wasn't expecting, and which revealed Cynthia's new nature.

In short, I haven't given up hope that one day you and I will agree. 😅 😅 😅
Just to conclude, if new animals are introduced into the story, I will continue following Lost Family. I will keep following the story, I am cool with it. I have no intention of being a pain in the ass for those who appreciate this kind of approach. Every reader has their own preferences, and I fully respect the taste of those who want to see other animals interacting with Cinthya.
 
Back
Top Bottom