Emilyvt
Active member
lol good oneHe didn't say what year.
I’m still annoyed that Dungeons & Dragons was really peaking a few years back, had a movie and everything - but not Da Young’n’s and Dragon pt 3
That’s just good business but no
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol good oneHe didn't say what year.
Yeah, that's the problem with a lot of his comics, and just ongoing porn comics in general. They start out with a lot of energy because they're based on a provocative premise that you're supposedly building towards. But then once you finally achieve that it becomes 10x harder to write a worthwhile continuation.I'm fine with the kink content, but these are the least interesting character pairings possible. Has the well run completely dry? (Yes) see you in 7 months for the next page.
Why is Ashley getting paler with every single panel? What happened to her original amber complexion? I know that Jab now use AI as colorist but if you get the correct promt the color can return good near the original!
Ewww AI.
Calm down.Ewww AI.
Released by him, not made by him.Calm down.
Let go of your pearls.
This is porn not high class art.
You're also in a Jab Comix thread and he's requesting art released by Jab.
WTF is the difference?Released by him, not made by him.
Well technically the sock thing could be potentially defended. There are Loli manga in which in between panel sock, stockings and even underwear removal occurs. Is this an exoneration of the one kinda humorous, misdemeanor charge in your indictment list, well technically I am not a BAR certified attorney specializing in contemporary Sub Genre Pop Culture/Perv Nerd law and Creator/Fan ethics, (but if that shit existed I could be an enthusiastic intern) but factoring in the fact that you did land all of your heavier felony punches, I am going to wisely put the probability that JABs missing sock is evidence of poor stewardship of craft at a safe and toothless 50/50Which part don't you buy? That he doesn't care or that it doesn't matter? We might care but he's demonstrated plenty of times he doesn't care all that much about consistency. Continuity just takes attention to detail and a bit of effort; effort he's repeatedly shown he can't be bothered with otherwise he'd do what you suggest and look back at some of his own comics. Leaving the socks off Eileen's feet in one panel of AP 17 and then putting them back on again in a later panel might trigger my OCD but it's no big deal. But when he just ignores one of the fundamental plot points of a whole series, say ignoring the fact that Angus and Sharona are supposed to never have had sex then no one is going to convince me he gives a fuck. Jab's more interested in seeing himself as some sort of cultural philosopher guru who others come to for pearls of wisdom about movies, animation and culture. Have you ever read some of that shit he comes out with about 'the future of all movies' or 'don't be afraid of AI'? Stay in your lane Jab, talk about stuff you have some understanding of and make sure Eileen's socks are on in all the panels you dingbat!
View attachment 2084392