• Staff Applications are OPEN! [ Staff / Moderator ] More Info HERE Help us make a better forum for everyone!

[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics

Crazydad3d was my favorite artist, today he's not even in my top 20, he was good at the beginning but he changed a lot, an example is Moms Help, he completely escaped history, it should be called Dog whore Mom.
Once again, this discussion about the "purity" of characters? Seriously, I can't understand what goes through the minds of people who confuse reality with fiction. If you don't like a certain theme, it's simple: don't consume it. Wait for a publication that fits your standards. But wanting to create rules about what can or cannot be seen or created is already crossing the line of your freedom of choice. There are plenty of publications that align with your preferences.
If you don't like it, avoid giving clueless opinions. Some people seem almost in love with a character created in 3D software, a product of the renderer's imagination. I can't figure out where you're trying to go with this. My advice? See a doctor to treat your "fictional schizophrenia."
By the way, it's impressive how far some people's imagination goes. It’s as if they believe these fictional characters are going to jump off the screen and start a real relationship with them. Maybe that's the big hope: a candlelit dinner with that "perfect" 3D character. Who knows, maybe even a virtual wedding, complete with a honeymoon in some rendered world.
But let's be honest: if the problem is the "purity" of the character, it seems like they're more concerned with pixels than their own lives. Meanwhile, the real world keeps turning, completely unaffected by these epic debates on what's appropriate or not in a cartoon.
And before anyone complains again, here’s a suggestion: why not create your own fiction, with your impeccable characters? That way, no one can complain, and you can finally have your digital utopia where nothing, absolutely nothing, deviates from your standards of perfection.
If the renderer doesn't change its style, it's going to stay as boring as it already is, with those stiff animations full of repetition. Always the same poses, just changing the angle, as if that’s something innovative. Creativity seems to be stuck in the same endless loop of poses. And the worst part? Besides enduring this unbearable visual repetition, we still have to deal with annoying people complaining about the "purity" of characters.
It's almost as if the real problem isn't the quality of the rendering, but the sanity of those who think 3D characters are actual people. I'd say it's not the renderer that needs an update, but the mental software of certain individuals.
It's not that I dislike PigKing's work, but with the potential he has, I really expect better things. You can see the talent is there, but it feels like he's still holding back the real impact of what he could deliver.
In short, in my opinion, all the characters without exception have to give their pussy to "the Dog".
 
Last edited:
Doctor Brandie - Parte 54

Page_01.jpg Page_03.jpg Page_04.jpg Page_05.jpg Page_07.jpg Page_15.jpg Page_16.jpg Page_17.jpg Page_18.jpg Page_19.jpg Page_20.jpg
 
Once again, this discussion about the "purity" of characters? Seriously, I can't understand what goes through the minds of people who confuse reality with fiction. If you don't like a certain theme, it's simple: don't consume it. Wait for a publication that fits your standards. But wanting to create rules about what can or cannot be seen or created is already crossing the line of your freedom of choice. There are plenty of publications that align with your preferences.
If you don't like it, avoid giving clueless opinions. Some people seem almost in love with a character created in 3D software, a product of the renderer's imagination. I can't figure out where you're trying to go with this. My advice? See a doctor to treat your "fictional schizophrenia."
By the way, it's impressive how far some people's imagination goes. It’s as if they believe these fictional characters are going to jump off the screen and start a real relationship with them. Maybe that's the big hope: a candlelit dinner with that "perfect" 3D character. Who knows, maybe even a virtual wedding, complete with a honeymoon in some rendered world.
But let's be honest: if the problem is the "purity" of the character, it seems like they're more concerned with pixels than their own lives. Meanwhile, the real world keeps turning, completely unaffected by these epic debates on what's appropriate or not in a cartoon.
And before anyone complains again, here’s a suggestion: why not create your own fiction, with your impeccable characters? That way, no one can complain, and you can finally have your digital utopia where nothing, absolutely nothing, deviates from your standards of perfection.
If the renderer doesn't change its style, it's going to stay as boring as it already is, with those stiff animations full of repetition. Always the same poses, just changing the angle, as if that’s something innovative. Creativity seems to be stuck in the same endless loop of poses. And the worst part? Besides enduring this unbearable visual repetition, we still have to deal with annoying people complaining about the "purity" of characters.
It's almost as if the real problem isn't the quality of the rendering, but the sanity of those who think 3D characters are actual people. I'd say it's not the renderer that needs an update, but the mental software of certain individuals.
It's not that I dislike PigKing's work, but with the potential he has, I really expect better things. You can see the talent is there, but it feels like he's still holding back the real impact of what he could deliver.
In short, in my opinion, all the characters without exception have to give their pussy to "the Dog".
What I said was nothing like that, not only did you not understand what I meant, but you also wrote a huge text in vain that makes no sense in my opinion. And even though he doesn't understand, he still doesn't respect other people's opinions.
 
Lol, I noticed that you keep referring to Nancy as a "he." :ROFLMAO: Imagine if PK did a "What If?" series where half the female MILFs suddenly became shemales and fucked the other half. It'd be nice to see Sonia fuck her sister Nancy with a real cock. Or if Cynthia was getting a blowjob from Brenda. 😋
My language is not English, blame the translator for that
 
I hope Owen uses this chance to show he's better than any animal, this story started because of his passion for Brandie - this should be a big kick in his pants to improve his sex game or he'll lose her forever!

Hopefully she'll say she's cheating or get caught by this somehow, I don't think there's been "betrayal sex" in a story before. Like he feels betrayed and fucks here with more aggression to get back at her; winning her back by showing how animalistic he can be.
 
Last edited:
What I said was nothing like that, not only did you not understand what I meant, but you also wrote a huge text in vain that makes no sense in my opinion. And even though he doesn't understand, he still doesn't respect other people's opinions.
You yourself say that you don’t understand anything about English. How do you expect to express yourself without knowing the language? Even using a translator, you need to be specific to avoid misunderstandings. I believe that the bestiality is what makes PigKing stand out, and I think all the characters should have relationships with dogs and Horses. Otherwise, things get boring, and it’ll be the same old thing. That’s precisely the unique aspect of PigKing.Look, I totally respect other people’s opinions, including yours, even though it’s clearly biased. I still stand by what I said, and if you’re not into bestiality stories, golden tip: don’t download them, okay? It’s that simple. Maybe you should wait for something that truly matches your refined taste before hitting that download button, right? Oh, and by the way, it’d be interesting to see all characters within this context too, since you’re such a loyal subscriber, aren’t you? Or am I wrong? And just for the record, it’s not my fault if you don’t understand English and, unfortunately, can’t spot sarcasm when it’s right in front of you. Good luck with that!
 
Placing three photos in sequence to simulate movement is a good initiative, but doing it more than 20 times loses its meaning.

Personally i'd have probably done a split page where one half is an animated sequence, the other half is text of what is being said throughout so you don't get the redundant repetition while also getting the content. Or something to that nature.

Alternatively take the sequence from different angles so it's different even if it's the same, so long as the dialog continues too. And sometimes focus purely on the face, especially when she goes ageho.
 
Personally i'd have probably done a split page where one half is an animated sequence, the other half is text of what is being said throughout so you don't get the redundant repetition while also getting the content. Or something to that nature.

Alternatively take the sequence from different angles so it's different even if it's the same, so long as the dialog continues too. And sometimes focus purely on the face, especially when she goes ageho.
Personally, I don't like repeated poses because they make the work feel static. PigKing could improve this by making small adjustments, like subtly changing the head position or slightly shifting the legs and arms. This would give the impression of movement and add more fluidity to the work. With just a simple mouse click, these changes could be made without taking much time, just a few seconds. I believe it's more a matter of mindset.
 
Personally, I don't like repeated poses because they make the work feel static. PigKing could improve this by making small adjustments, like subtly changing the head position or slightly shifting the legs and arms. This would give the impression of movement and add more fluidity to the work. With just a simple mouse click, these changes could be made without taking much time, just a few seconds. I believe it's more a matter of mindset.

Adding more sweat/juices, maybe changing the lighting a bit if it's daytime so shadows are different or to show progression of time a little. (though if it's seconds apart that isn't so important). Having several preset facial expressions and changing them with the change of the head angle, maybe clenching of muscles in arms/legs.... Maybe moving their position on the bed/couch and having more creases showing they are moving forward, or pillows falling to the ground. It's a lot of little things.

The human mind is good at recognizing patterns, so seeing the same thing over and over quickly gets boring.

Once again, this discussion about the "purity" of characters? Seriously, I can't understand what goes through the minds of people who confuse reality with fiction. If you don't like a certain theme
<snip>
By the way, it's impressive how far some people's imagination goes. It’s as if they believe these fictional characters are going to jump off the screen and start a real relationship with them.

Unless the storyline is based on corruption or naivety, then purity certainly isn't a big thing.

Yes fiction is fiction. However books are more than a collection of words, and 3D erotica is more than renders of images. To say, characters shouldn't be flat and 1-dimensional (well a couple that are that way are fine, but a small portion). I'm an avid ERPer, and there's a big distinction between a partner who jumps on you with weak dialog and descriptions and orgasms in 3 sentences, and one that puts more thought and character into their character to make it... while not seem realistic, have some sort of grounded personality and reasoning behind it.

Having well enough developed characters that you wish they could jump out of the screen, would be nice. But there's only so much time and space to put more detail out. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people put enough to make a viable product and don't drag a lot of less-interesting bits in, even if it would flesh it out. Between sex and plot/nonerotic, I personally prefer 70/30, lots of sex, but also plot and a storyline going forward to some end (connected or disconnected from a larger storyline). I usually also set long term goals for characters that will never come, the extra goals/details would let me specify things he is planning or doing or has towards those goals even if they are only passing background stuff like notes on a calender and books on the shelf, making them seem like more than just pussy/cock for current scene.

Heh, it's a little funny, and i'm sure i'm not the only one. Using and developing a character, at some point they make their own spot in your head, and you can just let them go and not have any control and they will dictate what happens independent of you. If you develop several such characters, then you just let them interact how they would interact and you're just putting it to paper/screen. If it happens you'll understand what i mean.
 

Similar threads

2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
42K
Replies
6
Views
25K
Replies
14
Views
75K
37 38 39 40 41
Replies
801
Views
2M
Back
Top Bottom