Once again, this discussion about the "purity" of characters? Seriously, I can't understand what goes through the minds of people who confuse reality with fiction. If you don't like a certain theme, it's simple: don't consume it. Wait for a publication that fits your standards. But wanting to create rules about what can or cannot be seen or created is already crossing the line of your freedom of choice. There are plenty of publications that align with your preferences.Crazydad3d was my favorite artist, today he's not even in my top 20, he was good at the beginning but he changed a lot, an example is Moms Help, he completely escaped history, it should be called Dog whore Mom.
What I said was nothing like that, not only did you not understand what I meant, but you also wrote a huge text in vain that makes no sense in my opinion. And even though he doesn't understand, he still doesn't respect other people's opinions.Once again, this discussion about the "purity" of characters? Seriously, I can't understand what goes through the minds of people who confuse reality with fiction. If you don't like a certain theme, it's simple: don't consume it. Wait for a publication that fits your standards. But wanting to create rules about what can or cannot be seen or created is already crossing the line of your freedom of choice. There are plenty of publications that align with your preferences.
If you don't like it, avoid giving clueless opinions. Some people seem almost in love with a character created in 3D software, a product of the renderer's imagination. I can't figure out where you're trying to go with this. My advice? See a doctor to treat your "fictional schizophrenia."
By the way, it's impressive how far some people's imagination goes. It’s as if they believe these fictional characters are going to jump off the screen and start a real relationship with them. Maybe that's the big hope: a candlelit dinner with that "perfect" 3D character. Who knows, maybe even a virtual wedding, complete with a honeymoon in some rendered world.
But let's be honest: if the problem is the "purity" of the character, it seems like they're more concerned with pixels than their own lives. Meanwhile, the real world keeps turning, completely unaffected by these epic debates on what's appropriate or not in a cartoon.
And before anyone complains again, here’s a suggestion: why not create your own fiction, with your impeccable characters? That way, no one can complain, and you can finally have your digital utopia where nothing, absolutely nothing, deviates from your standards of perfection.
If the renderer doesn't change its style, it's going to stay as boring as it already is, with those stiff animations full of repetition. Always the same poses, just changing the angle, as if that’s something innovative. Creativity seems to be stuck in the same endless loop of poses. And the worst part? Besides enduring this unbearable visual repetition, we still have to deal with annoying people complaining about the "purity" of characters.
It's almost as if the real problem isn't the quality of the rendering, but the sanity of those who think 3D characters are actual people. I'd say it's not the renderer that needs an update, but the mental software of certain individuals.
It's not that I dislike PigKing's work, but with the potential he has, I really expect better things. You can see the talent is there, but it feels like he's still holding back the real impact of what he could deliver.
In short, in my opinion, all the characters without exception have to give their pussy to "the Dog".
My language is not English, blame the translator for thatLol, I noticed that you keep referring to Nancy as a "he."Imagine if PK did a "What If?" series where half the female MILFs suddenly became shemales and fucked the other half. It'd be nice to see Sonia fuck her sister Nancy with a real cock. Or if Cynthia was getting a blowjob from Brenda.
![]()
I hope Owen uses this chance to show he's better than any animal, this story started because of his passion for Brandie - this should be a big kick in his pants to improve his sex game or he'll lose her forever!
You yourself say that you don’t understand anything about English. How do you expect to express yourself without knowing the language? Even using a translator, you need to be specific to avoid misunderstandings. I believe that the bestiality is what makes PigKing stand out, and I think all the characters should have relationships with dogs and Horses. Otherwise, things get boring, and it’ll be the same old thing. That’s precisely the unique aspect of PigKing.Look, I totally respect other people’s opinions, including yours, even though it’s clearly biased. I still stand by what I said, and if you’re not into bestiality stories, golden tip: don’t download them, okay? It’s that simple. Maybe you should wait for something that truly matches your refined taste before hitting that download button, right? Oh, and by the way, it’d be interesting to see all characters within this context too, since you’re such a loyal subscriber, aren’t you? Or am I wrong? And just for the record, it’s not my fault if you don’t understand English and, unfortunately, can’t spot sarcasm when it’s right in front of you. Good luck with that!What I said was nothing like that, not only did you not understand what I meant, but you also wrote a huge text in vain that makes no sense in my opinion. And even though he doesn't understand, he still doesn't respect other people's opinions.
when is it coming out?Miranda - Parte 09 - Coming soon View attachment 865368
God, I hope we see Bonnie go after the dog!Doctor Brandie - Parte 56 - Coming soonView attachment 914448
Placing three photos in sequence to simulate movement is a good initiative, but doing it more than 20 times loses its meaning.
Personally, I don't like repeated poses because they make the work feel static. PigKing could improve this by making small adjustments, like subtly changing the head position or slightly shifting the legs and arms. This would give the impression of movement and add more fluidity to the work. With just a simple mouse click, these changes could be made without taking much time, just a few seconds. I believe it's more a matter of mindset.Personally i'd have probably done a split page where one half is an animated sequence, the other half is text of what is being said throughout so you don't get the redundant repetition while also getting the content. Or something to that nature.
Alternatively take the sequence from different angles so it's different even if it's the same, so long as the dialog continues too. And sometimes focus purely on the face, especially when she goes ageho.
Personally, I don't like repeated poses because they make the work feel static. PigKing could improve this by making small adjustments, like subtly changing the head position or slightly shifting the legs and arms. This would give the impression of movement and add more fluidity to the work. With just a simple mouse click, these changes could be made without taking much time, just a few seconds. I believe it's more a matter of mindset.
Once again, this discussion about the "purity" of characters? Seriously, I can't understand what goes through the minds of people who confuse reality with fiction. If you don't like a certain theme
<snip>
By the way, it's impressive how far some people's imagination goes. It’s as if they believe these fictional characters are going to jump off the screen and start a real relationship with them.