[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics

02179052755539745c07e4ff35b1f55227084b3d76e9a80a01ef2.jpeg
02179052597428647fde1ce057a4e39ca4c3f804f8e42e0e9a4a4.jpeg
021790527745201c195b830dbec85207d05ecc18a972ce6f112de.jpeg
02179052791150339debe34dc0faea573b1e9db2da7e27bb6ee91.jpeg
 
46_PDFsam_Doctor Brandie 45.jpeg
46_PDFsam_Doctor Brandie 45.jpeg
The question I ask myself is whether onomatopoeic words are truly relevant and if they actually help compose a scene. Here we have an example where an onomatopoeic word hindered the scene rather than helped it: in this scene, the graphic design conveys the action thoroughly, without the need for the visual clutter of onomatopoeic.
 
Jhony Cash (Trader) said:
View attachment 3019396View attachment 3019399The question I ask myself is whether onomatopoeic words are truly relevant and if they actually help compose a scene. Here we have an example where an onomatopoeic word hindered the scene rather than helped it: in this scene, the graphic design conveys the action thoroughly, without the need for the visual clutter of onomatopoeic.
Click to expand...
Personally, I like it ; it adds a sense—an impression—of "movement" to a static scene.
 
My friend Rabbit1033, are you so in love with onomatopoeic words—pow! vrum! bam!—that you just gave me a dislike purely because I criticized the noise? Tone down that passion a bit, my dear! It just a question! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
GHITA said:
Personally, I like it ; it adds a sense—an impression—of "movement" to a static scene.
Click to expand...
There is no problem at all in liking them; I like them too. The issue is that I got a bit traumatized because of Frank Romano and his festival of onomatopoeias! The big annoyance is where they put them: they place them right on top of the drawing, polluting the art and covering it up precisely where they shouldn't. (y)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top