It's a familiar narrative... not all publications can, or should, follow the same formula of the incestuous son and the beggars on the street corner. Family Sins does it very well, so be it. The fact that JB has finally decided to give Sonia her own unique world is a breath of fresh air. Charles can reappear (I even think he once considered "selling" his adoptive mother to some friends), Juka of course, and what's more, the farm is becoming a world she can finally call her own. What's interesting is that everything is open to creating episodes beyond the bedroom, the living room, and the square down the street.
I can agree that the change of scenery will be good for the story but What's BEST for the story is to GO BACK to the introductory THEME of FOSTER MOTHER. Charles was SUPPOSED TO BE an integral part of the story. Idk What was on their minds when it Changed but I Do know where. It was After Charles got to visit his birth mother in the one-shot "Ophelia" story. Toward the End of that story Charles had told Ophelia that he would visit her but Sonia was his mother.
He was kept out of the story for so long that people Forgot that he was SUPPOSED to be the CO-MAIN CHARACTER of the story. And when they DID bring him back, it was at the farm where he fucked his mom, discovered that she was into bestiality and refused to have sex with her while the dog began to fuck her. Then he was Gone again.
Imho, what Should have happened There was, given the fact that Charles was a deviant too, once he saw that Sonia loved sex wih animals, he could have dominated his mother by convincing her to have sex with only him and the animals together in places of His choosing And him also having occasional sex with him and the animals while filming and watching her. He could Then continue his scheme of making money off of her by selling the videos. Those concepts wouldn't have been so hard to pull off as Sonia Deeply LOVES her Foster Son and had Admitted that she would do Anything For Him!!! Also, if the concept was used of Sonia having sex Only with him and the animals together at Any places that He chose, we could have Gotten those changes in locations, intensify the tension in Sonia as Charles' locations became more daring for public bestiality and Sonia wrestling with her fetish over pleasing Charles with His fetishes.
I believe that, had the story gone to that concept and pacing, we could have had an unique story. It wouldn't have been a blackmail story but one more of submission rather than coersion since Sonia has the combined love both for her animals AND her son.
Other aspects of Sonia's sex life could have been handled pretty much like in other stories such as the occasional fuck between her & her brother and father. Sonia could STILL reveal to Tony what she was doing and declaring that he either accept that fact or move on and Since Juka was trying to sell the farm Anyway, he could have simply bequeath the farm to her on the condition that she let him fuck her from time-to-time. That Way Sonia could Then be around her beloved animals, have the farm as a way to declare her independence from Tony AND make money, Still have sex with her beloved son Charles, could have sex with the farm help when necessary (but Only with Charles' Permission) and get away from this company's now tired obsession of the nympho FMCs always wanting sex with beggars. There would neither be no Place for it nor a NEED TO, since a lot of the principal story would be at the farm and occasionally at public or open locations of Charles' choosing. At least THAT's the way that "I" would have written it.
Also, it could be said that the artists could then Get Back to creating the more realistic mating poses for the various animals instead of the insanely stupid animal models posed over naked female bodies. Nothing in Most of the ongoing stories involving bestiality is erotic when those scenes are portrayed. It makes it look like the animals are bored (which couldn't happen because they Wouldn't Then have erections) or looking like stuffed propped animals used JUST TO SAY that there's bestiality in the story. If they CAN'T make the scenes realistic in mating, why even Bother because it only offends & frustrates those who have that particular kink with such unrealistic drivel. The Purpose of introducing that taboo was because of the highly erotic fantasies that it entails. INSTEAD we've been reduced to, imo, less-than-amateurish-style portrayals of beast/human copulation. Indeed, even Real Life amateur bestiality sex is more erotic than what's been Previously and Currently dislayed in the titles that have them. Without a doubt that, when they all were Started, the animal copulation poses were Hot BECAUSE the poses were REALISTIC. What we have Now are scenes that send the message that the artists and company are "going through the motions" simply to make Money rather than actually entertaining their readers and thus making even More money for the realism that those scenes can provide.
I, for one, can honestly say that, if more effort was put into actually entertaining me with the scenes (as the Stories have seemed to improved immensely), I wouldn't MIND paying the price for the subscription, even if only for a lttle while. I don't mind paying for Quality if I have to but I'm Certainly NOT going to Throw my money away on a product that's mediocre at Best and Substandard or lazy Worst.