• Staff Applications are OPEN! [ Staff / Moderator ] More Info HERE Help us make a better forum for everyone!

[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics

I'm curious to know who the woman with the short hair is. At first, I thought it was Emily, but the hair and body don't match.
 
The dog model is clearly suffering from severe rendering and rigging issues. Its proportions are inconsistent throughout the chapters, often appearing distorted and deformed. A dog that should resemble a Great Dane ends up looking more like a Basset Hound, with compressed limbs and an elongated torso. The model does not appear to be prepared for scale variation or complex poses, resulting in severe and recurring anatomical deformations. The model does not appear to be prepared for scale variation or complex poses, resulting in severe and recurring anatomical deformations. My suggestion would be to ask Teddy to teach Juanito how to properly render the dog. How many years has he been working on this and still keeps making so many basic mistakes? TThere’s a huge difference between Juanito’s work and Teddy’s work.
3.png
4.png
5.png
6.png
character!
 
Not gonna lie. This story is slowly becoming lost family 2.0 🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
In my heart I know I shouldn't agree with you, but you're also not entirely wrong. I believe the blame lies in the authors. Making Charles disappear all of a sudden undermined the whole incest theme. There's literally no one left for Sonia to have sex with if she never leaves the house. Brenda and Janine, on the other hand, would go out and have sex with strangers at the park. Sonia can't seem to make it to the corner of her street!
 

Sonia remains a superb character... however, her face has lost some of its expressiveness and her overall design has become a bit less striking, in my opinion. As for Byron, he's been, how shall I say... strange since the previous issue. But I'm eager to find out who these visitors are that she's showing off the property to. And the exterior scenery looks magnificently done.
 
In my heart I know I shouldn't agree with you, but you're also not entirely wrong. I believe the blame lies in the authors. Making Charles disappear all of a sudden undermined the whole incest theme. There's literally no one left for Sonia to have sex with if she never leaves the house. Brenda and Janine, on the other hand, would go out and have sex with strangers at the park. Sonia can't seem to make it to the corner of her street!

It's a familiar narrative... not all publications can, or should, follow the same formula of the incestuous son and the beggars on the street corner. Family Sins does it very well, so be it. The fact that JB has finally decided to give Sonia her own unique world is a breath of fresh air. Charles can reappear (I even think he once considered "selling" his adoptive mother to some friends), Juka of course, and what's more, the farm is becoming a world she can finally call her own. What's interesting is that everything is open to creating episodes beyond the bedroom, the living room, and the square down the street. 😁
 
Juanito Brown has released a new episode – Foster Mother – Part 58.
He also shared a new production line.
Oddly enough, the title of the upcoming episode hasn't yet been determined.

image_698c7045eb06b.jpg image_698c705d96757.jpg
 
Not gonna lie. This story is slowly becoming lost family 2.0 🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️

Well, I absolutely loved this latest episode, which I've finally finished reading, and @Juanito Brown Oficial is doing a fantastic job. First, he's building a compelling narrative structure, transforming Sonia from a (excuse my language) uninteresting housewife into a businesswoman willing to do anything to succeed, including exploiting her own perversions. I also have to mention the stunning artwork; I find it truly superb.

Are you thinking of LF ? ;) In a way, you're not wrong... LF has the best audience ratings and the highest quality scores. This is partly due to the fact that it's the only publication to date that has built a real narrative, going beyond the simple sex stories that generally follow one another without rhythm and, above all, without reason. I wish FM the same audience figures, and I believe it will.

JB is building a real story with a goal (notably to develop the farm she bought in the seed collection sector) and this is the beginning of a plot that will not prevent Sonia from adding other adventures to it.

Yes, there's still the minor issue with Byron's drawing, but that's a detail that will be quickly resolved. In any case, well done @Juanito Brown Oficial for this work ! 👏👏👏👏👏

0.png
 
Last edited:
It's a familiar narrative... not all publications can, or should, follow the same formula of the incestuous son and the beggars on the street corner. Family Sins does it very well, so be it. The fact that JB has finally decided to give Sonia her own unique world is a breath of fresh air. Charles can reappear (I even think he once considered "selling" his adoptive mother to some friends), Juka of course, and what's more, the farm is becoming a world she can finally call her own. What's interesting is that everything is open to creating episodes beyond the bedroom, the living room, and the square down the street. 😁
I can agree that the change of scenery will be good for the story but What's BEST for the story is to GO BACK to the introductory THEME of FOSTER MOTHER. Charles was SUPPOSED TO BE an integral part of the story. Idk What was on their minds when it Changed but I Do know where. It was After Charles got to visit his birth mother in the one-shot "Ophelia" story. Toward the End of that story Charles had told Ophelia that he would visit her but Sonia was his mother.
He was kept out of the story for so long that people Forgot that he was SUPPOSED to be the CO-MAIN CHARACTER of the story. And when they DID bring him back, it was at the farm where he fucked his mom, discovered that she was into bestiality and refused to have sex with her while the dog began to fuck her. Then he was Gone again.
Imho, what Should have happened There was, given the fact that Charles was a deviant too, once he saw that Sonia loved sex wih animals, he could have dominated his mother by convincing her to have sex with only him and the animals together in places of His choosing And him also having occasional sex with him and the animals while filming and watching her. He could Then continue his scheme of making money off of her by selling the videos. Those concepts wouldn't have been so hard to pull off as Sonia Deeply LOVES her Foster Son and had Admitted that she would do Anything For Him!!! Also, if the concept was used of Sonia having sex Only with him and the animals together at Any places that He chose, we could have Gotten those changes in locations, intensify the tension in Sonia as Charles' locations became more daring for public bestiality and Sonia wrestling with her fetish over pleasing Charles with His fetishes.
I believe that, had the story gone to that concept and pacing, we could have had an unique story. It wouldn't have been a blackmail story but one more of submission rather than coersion since Sonia has the combined love both for her animals AND her son.
Other aspects of Sonia's sex life could have been handled pretty much like in other stories such as the occasional fuck between her & her brother and father. Sonia could STILL reveal to Tony what she was doing and declaring that he either accept that fact or move on and Since Juka was trying to sell the farm Anyway, he could have simply bequeath the farm to her on the condition that she let him fuck her from time-to-time. That Way Sonia could Then be around her beloved animals, have the farm as a way to declare her independence from Tony AND make money, Still have sex with her beloved son Charles, could have sex with the farm help when necessary (but Only with Charles' Permission) and get away from this company's now tired obsession of the nympho FMCs always wanting sex with beggars. There would neither be no Place for it nor a NEED TO, since a lot of the principal story would be at the farm and occasionally at public or open locations of Charles' choosing. At least THAT's the way that "I" would have written it.
Also, it could be said that the artists could then Get Back to creating the more realistic mating poses for the various animals instead of the insanely stupid animal models posed over naked female bodies. Nothing in Most of the ongoing stories involving bestiality is erotic when those scenes are portrayed. It makes it look like the animals are bored (which couldn't happen because they Wouldn't Then have erections) or looking like stuffed propped animals used JUST TO SAY that there's bestiality in the story. If they CAN'T make the scenes realistic in mating, why even Bother because it only offends & frustrates those who have that particular kink with such unrealistic drivel. The Purpose of introducing that taboo was because of the highly erotic fantasies that it entails. INSTEAD we've been reduced to, imo, less-than-amateurish-style portrayals of beast/human copulation. Indeed, even Real Life amateur bestiality sex is more erotic than what's been Previously and Currently dislayed in the titles that have them. Without a doubt that, when they all were Started, the animal copulation poses were Hot BECAUSE the poses were REALISTIC. What we have Now are scenes that send the message that the artists and company are "going through the motions" simply to make Money rather than actually entertaining their readers and thus making even More money for the realism that those scenes can provide.
I, for one, can honestly say that, if more effort was put into actually entertaining me with the scenes (as the Stories have seemed to improved immensely), I wouldn't MIND paying the price for the subscription, even if only for a lttle while. I don't mind paying for Quality if I have to but I'm Certainly NOT going to Throw my money away on a product that's mediocre at Best and Substandard or lazy Worst.
 
Last edited:
Regarding Foster Mother 58, it feels like Pig King suffers from “interrupted intercourse syndrome”. The characters begin the sexual scene and suddenly it just ends, there is no climax, no proper finish, nothing. It leaves that feeling of milk that was never spilled, as if the big moment had been promised but cut off seconds before the conclusion.
I wonder what would happen if adult film producers started adopting the same technique, interrupting the scene before the payoff, without that final moment that in this kind of genre, whether in film or graphic art, is usually the peak. It would certainly be an unusual experience, and probably a frustrating one for the audience.
Setting that aside, the disproportionate dog is genuinely distracting. The onomatopoeic letters, however, worked well, less is more. People want to see the drawing, not get distracted by excessive sound effects scattered across the scene. When used properly they complement the art, when overused they compete with it.
Overall, the story turned out well. What remains is to correct the technical mistakes. With goodwill, everything can be resolved. It is also fair to acknowledge the positive aspects when they appear.
26_PDFsam_Foster Mother 58.jpg
27_PDFsam_Foster Mother 58.jpg
28_PDFsam_Foster Mother 58.jpg
 
I can agree that the change of scenery will be good for the story but What's BEST for the story is to GO BACK to the introductory THEME of FOSTER MOTHER. Charles was SUPPOSED TO BE an integral part of the story. Idk What was on their minds when it Changed but I Do know where. It was After Charles got to visit his birth mother in the one-shot "Ophelia" story. Toward the End of that story Charles had told Ophelia that he would visit her but Sonia was his mother.
He was kept out of the story for so long that people Forgot that he was SUPPOSED to be the CO-MAIN CHARACTER of the story. And when they DID bring him back, it was at the farm where he fucked his mom, discovered that she was into bestiality and refused to have sex with her while the dog began to fuck her. Then he was Gone again.
Imho, what Should have happened There was, given the fact that Charles was a deviant too, once he saw that Sonia loved sex wih animals, he could have dominated his mother by convincing her to have sex with only him and the animals together in places of His choosing And him also having occasional sex with him and the animals while filming and watching her. He could Then continue his scheme of making money off of her by selling the videos. Those concepts wouldn't have been so hard to pull off as Sonia Deeply LOVES her Foster Son and had Admitted that she would do Anything For Him!!! Also, if the concept was used of Sonia having sex Only with him and the animals together at Any places that He chose, we could have Gotten those changes in locations, intensify the tension in Sonia as Charles' locations became more daring for public bestiality and Sonia wrestling with her fetish over pleasing Charles with His fetishes.
I believe that, had the story gone to that concept and pacing, we could have had an unique story. It wouldn't have been a blackmail story but one more of submission rather than coersion since Sonia has the combined love both for her animals AND her son.
Other aspects of Sonia's sex life could have been handled pretty much like in other stories such as the occasional fuck between her & her brother and father. Sonia could STILL reveal to Tony what she was doing and declaring that he either accept that fact or move on and Since Juka was trying to sell the farm Anyway, he could have simply bequeath the farm to her on the condition that she let him fuck her from time-to-time. That Way Sonia could Then be around her beloved animals, have the farm as a way to declare her independence from Tony AND make money, Still have sex with her beloved son Charles, could have sex with the farm help when necessary (but Only with Charles' Permission) and get away from this company's now tired obsession of the nympho FMCs always wanting sex with beggars. There would neither be no Place for it nor a NEED TO, since a lot of the principal story would be at the farm and occasionally at public or open locations of Charles' choosing. At least THAT's the way that "I" would have written it.
Also, it could be said that the artists could then Get Back to creating the more realistic mating poses for the various animals instead of the insanely stupid animal models posed over naked female bodies. Nothing in Most of the ongoing stories involving bestiality is erotic when those scenes are portrayed. It makes it look like the animals are bored (which couldn't happen because they Wouldn't Then have erections) or looking like stuffed propped animals used JUST TI SAY that there's bestiality in the story. If they CAN'T make the scenes realistic in mating, why even Bother because it only offends & frustrates those who have that particular kink with such unrealistic drivel. The Purpose of introducing that taboo was because of the highly erotic fantasies that it entails. INSTEAD we've been reduced to, imo, less-than-amateurish-style portrayals of beast/human copulation. Indeed, even Real Life amateur bestiality sex is more erptic than what's been Previously and Currently dislayed in the titles that have them. Without a doubt that, when they all were Started, the animal copulation poses were Hor BECAUSE the poses were REALISTIC. What we have Now are scenes that send the message that the artists and company are "going through the motions" simply to make Money rather than actually entertaining their readers and thus making even More money for the realism that those scenes can provide.
I, for one, can honestly say that, if more effort was put into actually entertaining me with the scenes (as the Stories have seemed to improved immensely), I wouldn't MIND paying the price for the subscription, even if only for a lttle while. I don't mind paying for Quality if I have to but I'm Certainly NOT going to Throw my money away on a product that's mediocre at Best and Substandard or lazy Worst.
Everyone has their own fetish, that is fair. In the case of bestiality, however, my interest is in observing these scenes through the perspective of artists like Teddy. I agree that the scenes should be better developed, not just a simple overlay of bodies.
PigKing might need to watch porn films to understand how directors handle the issue of penetration in scenes, aiming at least for something visually similar in terms of composition and staging. There are 3D artists who portray these types of scenes with much higher quality, which shows that it is possible to do better.
Perhaps the problem lies in plugins that do not provide enough range for leg movement, or in specific tools meant to simulate vaginal and anal dilation. I do not know whether the limitation is hardware or software related, but it is clear that there is some technical obstacle.
In the meantime, what really makes a difference is the willingness to improve. With dedication, study, and technical adjustments, the overall quality can improve significantly.
 
1770831697493.png
1770831901436.png


The perv Richard remembers me Los Moais.

Pd. He is not worried why he was left or given to adoption just to fuck Rose's ass haha what a perv
 
Everyone has their own fetish, that is fair. In the case of bestiality, however, my interest is in observing these scenes through the perspective of artists like Teddy. I agree that the scenes should be better developed, not just a simple overlay of bodies.
PigKing might need to watch porn films to understand how directors handle the issue of penetration in scenes, aiming at least for something visually similar in terms of composition and staging. There are 3D artists who portray these types of scenes with much higher quality, which shows that it is possible to do better.
Perhaps the problem lies in plugins that do not provide enough range for leg movement, or in specific tools meant to simulate vaginal and anal dilation. I do not know whether the limitation is hardware or software related, but it is clear that there is some technical obstacle.
In the meantime, what really makes a difference is the willingness to improve. With dedication, study, and technical adjustments, the overall quality can improve significantly.
I could agree if That's How the stories Began but they started with realistic poses. Look at early Family Sins and Foster Mother episodes. The dogs were properly posed in copulation because it semed that, whoever posed them were either actual pet Owners and knew what it should look like Or someone had watched some RL bestie scenes to get those scenes done right. By the time that those titles hit in their 30s or 40s in number sequence (and Dr. Brandie is an example of it as well), the sex poses became more of a "oh what the Hell, just put the dogs over the FMCs, They don't care so long as they get a scene" type of mentality. People can't Help but be Frustrated and angry when such a Drastic and Uncaring change is made to their favorite stories. It's like having and FMC who's shapely, vibrant and insanely hot and replacing her with an overweight, homely and slouchy-type personality female then trying to continue the story. It's an Insult to all who started following the titles in the First place. I contend that it's Not improvement as much as it is going Back to what Worked that will make a difference. I want to reiterate that I don't necessarily blame the artist but I Will blame he company's powers that be for the changes. If it were 1 or 2 titles, I could say that is more on the artist but for bestie titles across the board, That seems more on the Company's Mandate to skimp on production fo the sake of squeezing out titles, some of which Aren't very interesting to me. Ratherr than pushing forward with already popular titles, they keep creating More New ones, which delays the updates for the popular ones even more and in Turn, creates More unnecessary work and tighter deadlines. As the old saying Goes: "Sometimes it's better to let sleeping dogs lie." They Should have stuck with what Worked rather than worry about pushing out More titles for more money. If they did it right & Consistently, the money would have come Anyway!!
 
I could agree if That's How the stories Began but they started with realistic poses. Look at early Family Sins and Foster Mother episodes. The dogs were properly posed in copulation because it semed that, whoever posed them were either actual pet Owners and knew what it should look like Or someone had watched some RL bestie scenes to get those scenes done right. By the time that those titles hit in their 30s or 40s in number sequence (and Dr. Brandie is an example of it as well), the sex poses became more of a "oh what the Hell, just put the dogs over the FMCs, They don't care so long as they get a scene" type of mentality. People can't Help but be Frustrated and angry when such a Drastic and Uncaring change is made to their favorite stories. It's like having and FMC who's shapely, vibrant and insanely hot and replacing her with an overweight, homely and slouchy-type personality female then trying to continue the story. It's an Insult to all who started following the titles in the First place. I contend that it's Not improvement as much as it is going Back to what Worked that will make a difference. I want to reiterate that I don't necessarily blame the artist but I Will blame he company's powers that be for the changes. If it were 1 or 2 titles, I could say that is more on the artist but for bestie titles across the board, That seems more on the Company's Mandate to skimp on production fo the sake of squeezing out titles, some of which Aren't very interesting to me. Ratherr than pushing forward with already popular titles, they keep creating More New ones, which delays the updates for the popular ones even more and in Turn, creates More unnecessary work and tighter deadlines. As the old saying Goes: "Sometimes it's better to let sleeping dogs lie." They Should have stuck with what Worked rather than worry about pushing out More titles for more money. If they did it right & Consistently, the money would have come Anyway!!
You raised a point that makes a lot of sense and is coherent.
 
Regarding Foster Mother 58, it feels like Pig King suffers from “interrupted intercourse syndrome”. The characters begin the sexual scene and suddenly it just ends, there is no climax, no proper finish, nothing. It leaves that feeling of milk that was never spilled, as if the big moment had been promised but cut off seconds before the conclusion.
I wonder what would happen if adult film producers started adopting the same technique, interrupting the scene before the payoff, without that final moment that in this kind of genre, whether in film or graphic art, is usually the peak. It would certainly be an unusual experience, and probably a frustrating one for the audience.
Setting that aside, the disproportionate dog is genuinely distracting. The onomatopoeic letters, however, worked well, less is more. People want to see the drawing, not get distracted by excessive sound effects scattered across the scene. When used properly they complement the art, when overused they compete with it.
Overall, the story turned out well. What remains is to correct the technical mistakes. With goodwill, everything can be resolved. It is also fair to acknowledge the positive aspects when they appear.View attachment 2289784View attachment 2289785View attachment 2289786
The style that you're referring to is called an "ellipse" and you're Right, it is poorly done. A simple black screen or an opague screen like the first scene that you posted with the words "Several minutes later" or "30 minutes later", etc., Could have made that second scene a more palatable one. You Still would have felt a bit robbed but At Least one could imaging that Sonia was doing other things or just basking in her knotting. As it Stands, the whole sequence is off AND off-putting.
 
The latest issue of DB... personally, I hate to say it, but I'm a little disappointed, especially with the art. This episode is a transition, of course, but I feel that Rose's character has deteriorated compared to the previous episodes (5 or 34). First, her hairstyle, and then her body, which used to be voluptuous yet athletic, has become as if she's covered in cellulite. In short, I hope we'll soon pick up where Brandie and Bonnie's adventures left off, but that's just my opinion. 😞😞View attachment 2285368
Is it just me or the makers mixed up two episodes with each other? I mean after owen catches brandie and willie, the page says check Dr Brandie 64 but then the next page shifts to Rose's side of the story. Is it a technical error or...🤔🤔
 
Is it just me or the makers mixed up two episodes with each other? I mean after owen catches brandie and willie, the page says check Dr Brandie 64 but then the next page shifts to Rose's side of the story. Is it a technical error or...🤔🤔
I was wondering that, too.

DB64 (15).jpg
 

Similar threads

2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
42K
Replies
6
Views
25K
Replies
14
Views
75K
37 38 39 40 41
Replies
801
Views
2M
Back
Top Bottom