[Pigking/CrazyDad] Comics

[zarya1]

One of the issues with exaggerated proportions in erotic works is that they inevitably run up against the limits of anatomy, especially when artistic freedom comes into play. I like to explore themes such as exaggerated proportions in penetration scenes, with a focus on vaginal penetration by excessively large members. There are plugins that allow adjustments, for example to the diameter of the vagina, enabling a more coherent fit with the width of the penis in 3D-generated erotic works.
However, in scenes using an X-ray effect, when the size goes beyond the limits of the body, a certain visual imbalance emerges. I have already seen situations in which the author had to reduce the size of the member so that it would fit inside the vagina, because the original size was too large and the penetration scene could not stay within the limits of vaginal dilation allowed by the 3D software.
A possible solution is the use of specialized plugins, such as those available on Renderotica, which make it possible to apply the necessary adjustments for vaginal dilation in penetration scenes, offering greater technical control and more consistent results even in more extreme visual proposals.

View attachment 2274885

More than plugins and mathematical science, common sense should be used: if it measures 1 meter and only 30 centimeters fit, the other 70 centimeters remain outside and it is pushed like this:

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

More than plugins and mathematical science, common sense should be used: if it measures 1 meter and only 30 centimeters fit, the other 70 centimeters remain outside and it is pushed like this:View attachment 2274931

I’m referring to artistic freedom in exaggerated proportions, something you clearly failed to understand. There was no need to insert a filtered image here , in theory, we’re all adults.
The point is the use of the “X-ray” gimmick to depict the penetration of an extremely disproportionate horse-sized penis inside a woman’s body in 3D renderings. That’s precisely where exaggerated proportions come into direct conflict with anatomical limits.
The impression you give is that your goal isn’t to discuss the subject, but simply to disagree, as if you actually understood something you clearly don’t.

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

That would be a good argument for the X-ray effect...It would be one more argument in terms of effect. And I love it because it finally gives a clue, even if purely out of scientific curiosity, about how on earth the penis would be positioned inside the character. I admit it without shame, this doubt always haunts me.

 

[GHITA]

testing
View attachment 2274846

not a big fan of this sorry I much prefer it when the character expresses their feelings through dialogue rather than a "medical" version of the drawing.... (It's more sensual)

 

[GHITA]

I believe that those who dislike the theme should refrain from giving opinions, because they are very likely opposed to publications of this genre. In such cases, their views tend to be biased and resistant to any kind of innovation. It’s also worth noting that X-ray effects are widely known and used in both Japanese and Western publications, such as IllustratedInterracial comics. As this genre enjoys great success, as evidenced by the high number of views on these publications, I believe your opinion is irrelevant.

Just because the majority thinks the same stupid thing doesn't mean it isn't stupid... Joking aside, personally I don't like this kind of effect, because I find it unaesthetic and not everything necessarily needs to be seen. Seeing everything removes all feeling, all sensation.

And she conveys her feelings through dialogue... !!! for me, there's no need to verify every centimeter traveled with an X-ray.

And I don't understand why my opinion wouldn't be acceptable or respectable. (I've known you to be more tolerant.)

 

[TigerB]

I love that x-ray view, don't care what others say.

 

[doccop65]

Do we know what the rules are here regarding the bestiality in those Chapters? Wasn't allowed on the old site. TIA

No RL besty is allowed here, otherwise, for the time being at least, 3d RENDERED or 2d drawn are cool here.

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

Just because the majority thinks the same stupid thing doesn't mean it isn't stupid... Joking aside, personally I don't like this kind of effect, because I find it unaesthetic and not everything necessarily needs to be seen. Seeing everything removes all feeling, all sensation.

And she conveys her feelings through dialogue... !!! for me, there's no need to verify every centimeter traveled with an X-ray.

And I don't understand why my opinion wouldn't be acceptable or respectable. (I've known you to be more tolerant.)

I am tolerant up to a certain point. The problem is that some people, simply because they do not like something, think they have the right to forbid it. The question that remains is what exactly is the problem with artistic expression.

The X ray effect (Bestiality) is a widely used resource. There are people who do not like it and, worse, want to prohibit it by imposing a series of restrictions based on personal preferences. Because it is my character, because I am attached to them, because I do not allow this.


I am an adult and I think like an adult. I consider myself a well resolved person and I see things as they are, artistic expression. The occasional use of the X ray effect is a valid resource that can enrich the content. One or two pages using this resource do not change the story. What is often missing is the willingness to stop trying to romanticize pornography, which is derived from a more hardcore and explicit proposal by nature.


There are people who criticize certain themes for being considered taboo, but I do not transfer expectations from my personal life onto characters. The genre is constantly attacked, and there is always someone trying to dictate what can or cannot be done.


And to be clear, I do not need anyone to insert X ray scenes, I can do that myself. For me this is not a problem. Tolerance should not be confused with passivity, much less with accepting that others impose their personal tastes on someone else’s work .

And to make everything perfectly clear, the person who prompted my responses kept contradicting me as if I were spreading “fake news”, claiming that my information was false. I proved that it was accurate. I posted 2D publications by Western artists who use the X ray effect. Not satisfied, he then demanded examples in 3D. Once again, I presented the work of a Western artist in 3D that clearly shows X ray scenes.


There are people who are not here to have a dialogue. They are here only to impose their personal tastes on the artist’s work. The only artist who truly develops solid work is Teddy, and even so, he ends up being restricted by the personal preferences of people who cannot appreciate a piece without trying to control it.


These people should learn how to work with Daz3D Studio and create their own pieces instead of trying to limit or delegitimize someone else’s work.


Criticism is one thing. Imposing personal taste is something completely different.

 

[GHITA]

I am tolerant up to a certain point. The problem is that some people, simply because they do not like something, think they have the right to forbid it. The question that remains is what exactly is the problem with artistic expression.

The X ray effect (Bestiality) is a widely used resource. There are people who do not like it and, worse, want to prohibit it by imposing a series of restrictions based on personal preferences. Because it is my character, because I am attached to them, because I do not allow this.


I am an adult and I think like an adult. I consider myself a well resolved person and I see things as they are, artistic expression. The occasional use of the X ray effect is a valid resource that can enrich the content. One or two pages using this resource do not change the story. What is often missing is the willingness to stop trying to romanticize pornography, which is derived from a more hardcore and explicit proposal by nature.


There are people who criticize certain themes for being considered taboo, but I do not transfer expectations from my personal life onto characters. The genre is constantly attacked, and there is always someone trying to dictate what can or cannot be done.


And to be clear, I do not need anyone to insert X ray scenes, I can do that myself. For me this is not a problem. Tolerance should not be confused with passivity, much less with accepting that others impose their personal tastes on someone else’s work .

And to make everything perfectly clear, the person who prompted my responses kept contradicting me as if I were spreading “fake news”, claiming that my information was false. I proved that it was accurate. I posted 2D publications by Western artists who use the X ray effect. Not satisfied, he then demanded examples in 3D. Once again, I presented the work of a Western artist in 3D that clearly shows X ray scenes.


There are people who are not here to have a dialogue. They are here only to impose their personal tastes on the artist’s work. The only artist who truly develops solid work is Teddy, and even so, he ends up being restricted by the personal preferences of people who cannot appreciate a piece without trying to control it.


These people should learn how to work with Daz3D Studio and create their own pieces instead of trying to limit or delegitimize someone else’s work.


Criticism is one thing. Imposing personal taste is something completely different.

I don't doubt it, my friend; it was the wording that surprised me (the problem with writing sometimes).

For my part, I never presume to forbid anything, it's not in my nature. Occasionally, I offer an opinion, often specifying that it's a personal one.

My preferences are known to some. I'm enthusiastic when I like something and silent when I like it less, and I sometimes question things.

I occasionally contact the creators if I find something surprising, and they are often kind enough to explain. But I never do so publicly.

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

I don't doubt it, my friend; it was the wording that surprised me (the problem with writing sometimes).

For my part, I never presume to forbid anything, it's not in my nature. Occasionally, I offer an opinion, often specifying that it's a personal one.

My preferences are known to some. I'm enthusiastic when I like something and silent when I like it less, and I sometimes question things.

I occasionally contact the creators if I find something surprising, and they are often kind enough to explain. But I never do so publicly.

That’s fine, no one is obliged to agree with any opinion. The problem begins when the discussion turns into a pointless loop. Some people operate from ideological positions and try to impose a worldview, treating adults as if they were incapable of thinking for themselves.

The fact that adolescents and children consume pornography is real. There is no real control over this. Pretending it does not happen does not make the discussion more honest, only more hypocritical.

There are immature people who consume this type of content and still feel entitled to give shallow opinions. I understand that someone may dislike this level of explicitness, such as seeing the vagina and the uterus through an X ray effect. The point is that this simply does not bother me.

I look at all of this from the perspective of fun and distraction. I do not take pornography seriously or as something moralizing. I consider Teddy an excellent artist, someone who can develop work that is interesting and engaging to follow. For me, whether there are X ray scenes or not makes no difference at all.

But if Teddy decides to introduce this resource as a form of artistic expression, he will have my support. Because supporting the artist’s creative freedom is more important than imposing personal tastes.

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

I come from a generation where sticks and stones hurt; words just got a laugh. If that didn’t work, it was a fistfight.

 

[GHITA]

The latest issue of DB... personally, I hate to say it, but I'm a little disappointed, especially with the art. This episode is a transition, of course, but I feel that Rose's character has deteriorated compared to the previous episodes (5 or 34). First, her hairstyle, and then her body, which used to be voluptuous yet athletic, has become as if she's covered in cellulite. In short, I hope we'll soon pick up where Brandie and Bonnie's adventures left off, but that's just my opinion.

 

[TeddyPigking]

A última edição de DB... pessoalmente, detesto dizer isso, mas estou um pouco decepcionada, principalmente com a arte. Este episódio é uma transição, claro, mas sinto que a personagem da Rose piorou em comparação com os episódios anteriores (5 ou 34). Primeiro, o corte de cabelo dela, e depois o corpo, que antes era voluptuoso e atlético, agora parece coberto de celulite. Resumindo, espero que em breve retomemos as aventuras de Brandie e Bonnie de onde pararam, mas essa é apenas a minha opinião. View attachment 2285368

It's true, there was a change at the time, but I could only keep what they had asked me to do in terms of her appearance. I even thought about keeping the old one, but I was unsure about changing it again in such a short space of time.

 

[doccop65]

It's true, there was a change at the time, but I could only keep what they had asked me to do in terms of her appearance. I even thought about keeping the old one, but I was unsure about changing it again in such a short space of time.

What I've learned is, if you see that something's not working or that you made a mistake, it's better to correct it right away & explain appropriately than to let it go on to build up more confusion & animosity. Since you began putting your name in the credits, I believe that many here are willing to give you some leeway in creativity. For many of us, the old models work just fine but I'm sure that the company has a different mandate.
What I found recently on another site is why the AI-programmed models look more plasticized and it is because of an aversion to photo-realizism. If they look too life-life they could, quite possibly, draw the ire of the moral-majority spies and the nutcases out there who could cause potential censorship problems or even try to force the company to shut down by bullying the banks. Which is downright Insidious in their actions. What's ironic is that, those Same people who scream about freedom of speech, expression, religion, are the VERY ONES that are Pushing for censorship! Make that make sense.

 

[GHITA]

It's true, there was a change at the time, but I could only keep what they had asked me to do in terms of her appearance. I even thought about keeping the old one, but I was unsure about changing it again in such a short space of time.

Logical…. Thx for this answer

 

[GHITA]

It's true, there was a change at the time, but I could only keep what they had asked me to do in terms of her appearance. I even thought about keeping the old one, but I was unsure about changing it again in such a short space of time.

Understood, it’s logical…. Thx for the answer.

 

[zarya1]

It's true, there was a change at the time, but I could only keep what they had asked me to do in terms of her appearance. I even thought about keeping the old one, but I was unsure about changing it again in such a short space of time.

Is she referring to Brandie??

 

[GHITA]

Is she referring to Brandie??

View attachment 2285703

Absolutely.

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

It's true, there was a change at the time, but I could only keep what they had asked me to do in terms of her appearance. I even thought about keeping the old one, but I was unsure about changing it again in such a short space of time.

Personally, I consider the previous model of Rose to have been more attractive and aesthetically superior to the current one. If her appearance were changed back to how it was at the beginning, I believe it would be an improvement and would better please the readers, at least the majority of them.

 

[DupletT]

Juanito Brown created a fantastic preview for the new episode of Foster Mother – Part 58.
I'm really looking forward to seeing the full release tomorrow.