[PigKing/CrazyDad] Discussion / Controversies and Fan Service.

[GHITA]

Most people follow Pigking only for the comics, I don't think many are interested in the puzzle game or Devianart's works.

We completely agree !! So you remove what has been abandoned. The overall image is reflected by the website.

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

Don't worry about me, Rian. Forbidden desire is fleeting; Claire is the one who truly matters. Claire is the one who works magic in the heart, the one who takes us to heaven. She is independent. When I see her, I can only see the most beautiful princess in the world.

It is worth noting that the original series addresses bestiality, and everything indicates that this will be a permanent topic.

 

[lucy_lover]

We completely agree !! So you remove what has been abandoned. The overall image is reflected by the website.

Yes, the only exception is the videos. I wish Pigking had continued making and improving the videos, and why not adding AI voices to them.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

We meet again, @Jhony Cash (Trader) . That’s right. The old "Forbidden Desire" did include those things as part of its content. I never really liked that series, and I’d probably feel the same about the remake. Everything changed for me when they revealed Claire’s new design. She looked so beautiful, so incredibly beautiful.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

Honestly, I hope with all my heart that if the creators want to bring those things back, it’ll be just like in the original—with only Chloe having to do it. Don't get mad, @Rian. BUT NOT CLAIRE! She is the embodiment of a promise fulfilled; there is nothing beyond the beautiful Lady Claire. If something like that happened to her, all that would remain would be a beautiful dream of her. *Sigh* Claire...

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

We meet again, @Jhony Cash (Trader) . That’s right. The old "Forbidden Desire" did include those things as part of its content. I never really liked that series, and I’d probably feel the same about the remake. Everything changed for me when they revealed Claire’s new design. She looked so beautiful, so incredibly beautiful.

As people need to understand that the world does not revolve around them. Dealing with reality is sometimes a burden. The series remains the same with only some nuances but the theme has always been there. What should actually be done is simply to discard the chapters that do not align with personal tastes. The way you approach this makes it seem like a matter of life and death. Far too much drama for something that in practice does not have that much relevance.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

As people need to understand that the world does not revolve around them. Dealing with reality is sometimes a burden. The series remains the same with only some nuances but the theme has always been there. What should actually be done is simply to discard the chapters that do not align with personal tastes. The way you approach this makes it seem like a matter of life and death. Far too much drama for something that in practice does not have that much relevance.

It’s logical to think that way. A critical audience isn’t looking to create drama; it demands quality and representation. What you’re sharing is a good way to find detachment and not get so upset about things that simply can’t be changed. My counterargument. I believe that ignoring what one enjoys and perceives in the content one likes is a way to shut down the dialog, not to resolve it. Dismissing criticism as irrelevant absolves creators of responsibility and ignores the social influence on comic book narratives. A middle ground and an appropriate way to reach an agreement would be to practice the detachment you mention, without losing a critical stance based on individual preferences, and without passively accepting the phrase “If you don’t like it, don’t watch it.”

 

[Deleted member 46169]

To avoid sounding too serious, I’ll say that Claire is my life and I don’t want anything bad to happen to her.

 

[Rian]

It's really frustrating not being able to continue a project. Unfortunately, this is a constant issue on PK.
- Videos: abandoned
- Puzzles: completely abandoned
- and now the so-called poll. Stuck on Suky for a week, it was supposed to extend to other publications (at this rate it will take them 30 years)

How can someone work on the internet and not understand the basics ? The DeviantArt link always leads to a closed page, an Instagram promotion site, very poorly updated.

The Patreon site, which publishes Japanese-style AI comics almost daily, has nothing to do with PK's work.

This company is run in a completely improvised manner. This lack of rigor is incomprehensible, Maybe it's part of Brazilian culture, I really don't know.

It's simple. There’s too many stories that the creators can't handle all at once.
That is why I wish they would end at least 1/3 if these stories.

 

[Jhony Cash (Trader)]

It’s logical to think that way. A critical audience isn’t looking to create drama; it demands quality and representation. What you’re sharing is a good way to find detachment and not get so upset about things that simply can’t be changed. My counterargument. I believe that ignoring what one enjoys and perceives in the content one likes is a way to shut down the dialog, not to resolve it. Dismissing criticism as irrelevant absolves creators of responsibility and ignores the social influence on comic book narratives. A middle ground and an appropriate way to reach an agreement would be to practice the detachment you mention, without losing a critical stance based on individual preferences, and without passively accepting the phrase “If you don’t like it, don’t watch it.”

Not every criticism is automatically valid or productive. Creators are not obliged to engage with every possible reading of their work, especially when those readings stem from personal ideological assumptions rather than technical flaws, narrative issues, or the internal coherence of the work. An author’s responsibility lies in the consistency of the work they create, not in each spectator’s subjective interpretation.

The audience is not homogeneous, and trying to satisfy all sensitivities inevitably leads to creative dilution. Although every cultural work influences someone at some level, this does not turn the author into a moral tutor of society. That influence is always mediated by the reader’s repertoire, experience, and context. Shifting this responsibility onto the creator removes the audience’s autonomy and infantilizes artistic reception.

Criticism is a right. Demanding, however, that a work adapt itself to a specific worldview is not criticism; it is imposition. Dialogue only exists when both sides have the right to disagree, including the creator.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

Not every criticism is automatically valid or productive. Creators are not obliged to engage with every possible reading of their work, especially when those readings stem from personal ideological assumptions rather than technical flaws, narrative issues, or the internal coherence of the work. An author’s responsibility lies in the consistency of the work they create, not in each spectator’s subjective interpretation.

The audience is not homogeneous, and trying to satisfy all sensitivities inevitably leads to creative dilution. Although every cultural work influences someone at some level, this does not turn the author into a moral tutor of society. That influence is always mediated by the reader’s repertoire, experience, and context. Shifting this responsibility onto the creator removes the audience’s autonomy and infantilizes artistic reception.

Criticism is a right. Demanding, however, that a work adapt itself to a specific worldview is not criticism; it is imposition. Dialogue only exists when both sides have the right to disagree, including the creator.

Analyzing your argument from our context, you may have some reason to distinguish between criticism and imposition on the author. However, it must be recognized that the topic of animals is a social taboo, which weakens the argument for “authorial autonomy.” Normalizing extremely sensitive topics such as animals can lead to the desensitization of the general public. Here, criticism would no longer be considered a “personal ideological imposition,” but rather a defense of universal ethical values. Your “equality of ideologies” argument would fall apart if you prioritize the author’s right to express themselves over the protection of the most vulnerable (such as animals).

 

[Nippur]

Analyzing your argument from our context, you may have some reason to distinguish between criticism and imposition on the author. However, it must be recognized that the topic of animals is a social taboo, which weakens the argument for “authorial autonomy.” Normalizing extremely sensitive topics such as animals can lead to the desensitization of the general public. Here, criticism would no longer be considered a “personal ideological imposition,” but rather a defense of universal ethical values. Your “equality of ideologies” argument would fall apart if you prioritize the author’s right to express themselves over the protection of the most vulnerable (such as animals).

However, it must be recognized that the topic of animals is a social taboo, which weakens the argument for “authorial autonomy.” As incest too.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

In the end, it all depends on how those issues are perceived. We’re talking about a comic book, so it’s fine to validate your criticism as long as the comic only intends to be satirical and fictional; it would be annoying to protest on behalf of animals when none have been harmed in the process. Even so, I urge you to be very careful in distinguishing between what is absurd and what is actually meant.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

However, it must be recognized that the topic of animals is a social taboo, which weakens the argument for “authorial autonomy.” As incest too.

Very good, Nippur! That’s also very important. But Jhony’s argument is based on the fictional and satirical; it’s very good to know how to distinguish between those things.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

Ugh... I miss @Rian . I miss @58_inches_of_hips . They don’t want to laugh with me anymore, while they were plotting against Claire and I was defending her. And we talked about the Bible, the zodiac, and much more.

 

[Rian]

Ugh... I miss @Rian . I miss @58_inches_of_hips . They don’t want to laugh with me anymore, while they were plotting against Claire and I was defending her. And we talked about the Bible, the zodiac, and much more.

I'm trying to find some other target since claire is yesterday's news.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

I'm trying to find some other target since claire is yesterday's news.

Don't go on, Rian!

 

[Deleted member 46169]

I'm trying to find some other target since claire is yesterday's news.

What do you mean by finding another objective?

 

[Rian]

So

What do you mean by finding another objective?

Some other succubus.

 

[Deleted member 46169]

I don’t understand it, Rian. You don’t like succubus, why would you want more?