[Various Artists] Family Album
- Thread starter Silver Fox
- Start date
- ai-gen
- incest
- milf
Tigertooth
Active member
Now.... where did I see that one before...
Mom's morning blowjob's better than any alarm clock ...
Crediting the creator would be nice...
jgepowers
Active member
Sorry, don't know who did it. Found on another site, like most others.Now.... where did I see that one before...
Crediting the creator would be nice...
JennaJJ
Well-known member
... That’s exactly what I always think, too ... if you’re going to post someone else’s images, you really could mention the original creator somehow XD ...Crediting the creator would be nice...
... "Good morning my Brother ... let's start the day with a high proteine breakfast
" by ComfyRambler ...
poser
Active member
Definitely credit the original author!!!!! jgepowers, if you don't know who the author was AT LEAST mention that you got it from somewhere, make sure people know you didn't create it.... That’s exactly what I always think, too ... if you’re going to post someone else’s images, you really could mention the original creator somehow XD ...
... "Good morning my Brother ... let's start the day with a high proteine breakfast
View attachment 3076306
Tigertooth
Active member
It's one of the first images I created in the thread "The beauty of mother and son" in this same forum
jgepowers
Active member
Well, guess what my friend; YOU created a violation. The post was taken down by the Morality Police.
Tigertooth
Active member
Just saw that right now... I have fucking had it.
Kind of funny that after some people nicely asked that certain individuals contact the creators about concerns.... those same creators suddenly lost a lot of posts/threads.
Am I the only one seeing a pattern?
The post "The beauty of mothers and sons" has been up for months and months, got a lot of reactions and positive messages... and now suddenly it is a violation....
Some people say they want to keep this forum. We are some who also wanted to keep it alive and abide by the rules.... but it won't be with my creations anymore. I'll keep creating but it will only be for my own archives. Those who try to justify their morality police actions are also the ones who risk killing it....
I'm out of here
Last edited:
OldGreyGeek
Active member
Nothing personal here except your declaration that the author "created a violation".
I would argue not. The author created a picture. Some unnamed, untitled, back office minion either independently or based on some unnamed entities complaint, for some ambiguous rule without stating the offensive element of said picture.
Rule 7.1 Any AI-generated content that resembles minors or teens is absolutely prohibited.
Anyone who cares to support the idea of "resembles minors" or (resembles) "teens" is welcome to take a shot at defining the terms. e.g. so an AI image of a 19-yo prostitute/call-girl/whatever is verboten by definition being less than 20. With the general direction that there is no hair below the head, that as a secondary sex characteristic is out.
Oh, and by the way, what makes AI/SI so special? Best guess is that it the creator uses the near photo realistic mode there MIGHT be some confusion. If they use the cartoon quality there should be no confusion. CGI is OK, AI/SI not. BTHOM or BOHICA.
Here endith the rant.
OldGreyGeek
Active member
See my post immediately following yours.
You tell 'em.
Someone prone to conspiracy theories might wonder if there is a move by "unnamed" complaints to either impose an individual sense of morality on the rest of us or reduce/constrain viewership in some way.
As an afterthought, any way to get on a private distribution list?
Last edited:
