jgepowers
Active member
Well, guess what my friend; YOU created a violation. The post was taken down by the Morality Police.
[Various Artists] Family Album
- Thread starter Silver Fox
- Start date
- ai-gen
- incest
- milf
Tigertooth
Active member
Just saw that right now... I have fucking had it.
Kind of funny that after some people nicely asked that certain individuals contact the creators about concerns.... those same creators suddenly lost a lot of posts/threads.
Am I the only one seeing a pattern?
The post "The beauty of mothers and sons" has been up for months and months, got a lot of reactions and positive messages... and now suddenly it is a violation....
Some people say they want to keep this forum. We are some who also wanted to keep it alive and abide by the rules.... but it won't be with my creations anymore. I'll keep creating but it will only be for my own archives. Those who try to justify their morality police actions are also the ones who risk killing it....
I'm out of here
Last edited:
OldGreyGeek
Active member
Nothing personal here except your declaration that the author "created a violation".
I would argue not. The author created a picture. Some unnamed, untitled, back office minion either independently or based on some unnamed entities complaint, for some ambiguous rule without stating the offensive element of said picture.
Rule 7.1 Any AI-generated content that resembles minors or teens is absolutely prohibited.
Anyone who cares to support the idea of "resembles minors" or (resembles) "teens" is welcome to take a shot at defining the terms. e.g. so an AI image of a 19-yo prostitute/call-girl/whatever is verboten by definition being less than 20. With the general direction that there is no hair below the head, that as a secondary sex characteristic is out.
Oh, and by the way, what makes AI/SI so special? Best guess is that it the creator uses the near photo realistic mode there MIGHT be some confusion. If they use the cartoon quality there should be no confusion. CGI is OK, AI/SI not. BTHOM or BOHICA.
Here endith the rant.
OldGreyGeek
Active member
See my post immediately following yours.
You tell 'em.
Someone prone to conspiracy theories might wonder if there is a move by "unnamed" complaints to either impose an individual sense of morality on the rest of us or reduce/constrain viewership in some way.
As an afterthought, any way to get on a private distribution list?
Last edited:
superiornutcase
Active member
superiornutcase
Active member
Bell
Active member
With all due respect, don’t tell me what I am obliged to do when it comes to reporting others, that is completely my own decision.
And if you want to continue the way you do, I will continue to treat others with respect!
You and a few others are now making us serious people stop posting pictures, and you’re doing a good job.
But in the completely wrong way and without thinking about the consequences.
As always, I am polite and wish you good luck in your mission, and now?
Now I am waiting with excitement to see which of my pictures that have been published for a long time will be reported and deleted?
Have a good and conflict-free life.
Tigertooth
Active member
So, now Jocasta, Bell and I, amongst several others have decided to call it quits. It's going well for the self pronounced morality police. Just continue like this and big parts of this forum will die slowly.
I know for a fact that none... I repeat; NONE of my creations had child stuff or 12-14 year olds. If a person looks 16 or 18+, who is to decide whether it is 16 or 18+... or 18+ or 20.
At the same time that same "police" apparently are OK with shota cartoons/comic-like stuff where the caracters are even younger.
"Ohh... but those are only cartoons" some will say. But in the mind of a creator, does it really make a difference? What is the true reason for making it, even though it is made as a cartoon/comic? The thought makes the picture.
Quote from Collfree; "It's not like we go around to every thread to find shit to report"
What a load of bullocks !! Explain to me again why it is that a thread that has been up for months and months gets deleted immediately after I mentioned it in a reply to somebody here on the forum. Try again to convince me that it was not reported because it was Tigertooth who had made it... the same Tigertooth who spoke up against you. A concern could have been written in a message to me and I would have looked at it and have edited the posts in question if I felt that there could be a case. But the self-proclaimed morality police chose not to do so..... even when I as a creator were open for cooperation.
Dear Creatives, please don’t start arguing with each other—just report any images that violate the rules to us moderators. Please keep in mind that we all want to follow the law, and the law states that minors may not be depicted in connection with sexual content. After all, we all want to avoid having our forum shut down, just like what happened to the old 8Muses forum.
Tigertooth
Active member
I still haven't gotten an answer to why it is that it apparently is impossible to contact the creator and ask them to edit a thread by deleting certain images. Instead whole threads with 50-100 pictures gets deleted even though 98% of the images in the thread are within the rules.
If you consistently delete all images that violate our rules, I'll reopen your thread for you.
Tigertooth
Active member
As I said earlier, I'm done making creations here, so don't bother